Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

November 3, 2025

Second Quantization and the Kepler Problem

Posted by John Baez

The poet Blake wrote that you can see a world in a grain of sand. But even better, you can see a universe in an atom!

Bound states of hydrogen atom correspond to states of a massless quantum particle moving at the speed of light around the Einstein universe — a closed, static universe where space is a 3-sphere. We need to use a spin-½ particle to account for the spin of the electron. The states of the massless spin-½ particle where it forms a standing wave then correspond to the orbitals of the hydrogen atom. This explains the secret 4-dimensional rotation symmetry of the hydrogen atom.

In fact, you can develop this idea to the point of getting the periodic table of elements from a quantum field theory on the Einstein universe! I worked that out here:

but you can see a more gentle explanation in the following series of blog articles.

Posted at 8:51 AM UTC | Permalink | Post a Comment

November 2, 2025

Dynamics in Jordan Algebras

Posted by John Baez

In ordinary quantum mechanics, in the special case where observables are described as self-adjoint n×nn \times n complex matrices, we can describe time evolution of an observable O(t)O(t) using Heisenberg’s equation

ddtO(t)=i[H,O(t)] \frac{d}{d t} O(t) = -i [H, O(t)]

where HH is a fixed self-adjoint matrix called the Hamiltonian. This framework is great when we want to focus on observables rather than states. But Heisenberg’s equation doesn’t make sense in a general Jordan algebra. In this stripped-down framework, all we can do is raise observables to powers and take real linear combinations of them. This lets us define a ‘Jordan product’ of observables:

AB=12((A+B) 2A 2B 2)=12(AB+BA) A \circ B = \frac{1}{2} ((A + B)^2 - A^2 - B^2) = \frac{1}{2} (A B + B A)

but not commutators and not multiplication by ii. What do we do then?

Posted at 10:25 AM UTC | Permalink | Post a Comment