May 12, 2015
Action-Angle Variables
This semester, I taught the Graduate Mechanics course. As is often the case, teaching a subject leads you to rethink that you thought you understood, sometimes with surprising results.
The subject for today’s homily is Action-Angle variables.
Let be a -dimensional symplectic manifold. Let us posit that had a foliation by -dimensional Lagrangian tori (a torus, , is Lagrangian if ). Removing a subset, , of codimension , where the leaves are singular, we can assume that all of the leaves on are smooth tori of dimension .
The objective is to construct coordinates with the following properties.
- The restrict to angular coordinates on the tori. In particular shifts by when you go around the corresponding cycle on .
- The are globally-defined functions on which are constant on each torus.
- The symplectic form .
From 1, it’s clear that it’s more convenient to work with the 1-forms , which are single-valued (and closed, but not necessarily exact), rather than with the themselves. In 2, it’s rather important that the are really globally-defined. In particular, an integrable Hamiltonian is a function . The are the conserved quantities which make the Hamiltonian integrable.
Obviously, a given foliation is compatible with infinitely many “integrable Hamiltonians,” so the existence of a foliation is the more fundamental concept.
All of this is totally standard.
What never really occurred to me is that the standard construction of action-angle variables turns out to be very closely wedded to the particular case of a cotangent bundle, .
As far as I can tell, action-angle variables don’t even exist for foliations of more general symplectic manifolds, .