Posts with this logo use 
Low-functioning pinhead...
July 30, 2007
Sicko
My wife and I finally got around to seeing the Michael Moore movie.
Over dinner, she asked me, “So, do you think there’s any chance of ever getting National Health Care in this country?” I shrugged, “Sure. Why not? It happened in my lifetime in Canada.” Of course, the medical establishment fought it tooth and nail; in Québec, I recall, the doctors staged a Province-wide strike. But they came around fairly quickly, when they realized that the Government paid their claims promptly and in full, unlike the Insurance Companies, whose business model consists of denying claims and paying out the ones they accept as slowly as legally possible.
The only question, as I see it, is who’s going to play the role of Tommy Douglas? Douglas was mentioned in Moore’s film, as the father of Canada’s Medicare system, along with the tidbit that he has been voted the Greatest Canadian of all time. Moore notes that Douglas beat out such obvious candidates as Canada’s first Prime Minister and Wayne Gretzky, but never explains why.
In brief: as Premier of Saskatchewan, Douglas pushed through legislation, needless to say over the vociferous objections of the Medical establishment, to create the first prototype of the Medicare program at the provincial level. He went on to found the Federal New Democratic Party in 1961, and his program for universal coverage was enacted by his successor in 1962.
On the Federal level, with Douglas at the helm, the NDP campaigned tirelessly for a national version of the Saskatchewan program. It didn’t take long for this fringe left-wing idea to become mainstream. In 1966, the Liberal Pearson government1 enacted a Federal version of Douglas’s program.
The rest, as they say, is History.
In many ways, it should be much easier here. Unlike back then, there’s a broad consensus that the health care system in this country is broken. Forty years on, every American health care professional I’ve talked to (not least, my wife) is so fed up with the Insurance Companies that they’re more liable to embrace the change than to protest.
So the expanded answer to my wife’s question is: what we need is a successful implementation at the State level by some intrepid Governor, and then someone to champion making the program national.
The temptation, among our risk-averse politicians, is to “triangulate” and attempt to buy off the Insurance Companies. I don’t think this will succeed. If, on the other hand, one of y’all were to take them on and win, you’d stand a very good chance of being remembered as The Greatest American of all time. Something to think about, no?
Update: Some Data to Ponder
| Country | Life Expectancy (years) | Total Exp. on Health/Capita (US$) | Total Exp. on Health (% of GDP) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | 81.8 | 2139 | 8.0 |
| Iceland | 80.7 | 3115 | 10.5 |
| Spain | 80.5 | 1835 | 7.9 |
| Switzerland | 80.4 | 3781 | 11.5 |
| Australia | 80.3 | 2699 | 9.2 |
| Sweden | 80.2 | 2703 | 9.3 |
| Italy | 79.9 | 2258 | 8.4 |
| Canada | 79.7 | 3001 | 9.9 |
| Norway | 79.5 | 3807 | 10.1 |
| France | 79.4 | 2903 | 10.4 |
| New Zealand | 78.7 | 1886 | 8.0 |
| Austria | 78.6 | 2280 | 9.6 |
| Netherlands | 78.6 | 2976 | 9.1 |
| Finland | 78.5 | 2118 | 7.4 |
| United Kingdom | 78.5 | 2231 | 7.8 |
| Germany | 78.4 | 2996 | 10.8 |
| Luxembourg | 78.2 | 3705 | 7.7 |
| Belgium | 78.1 | 2827 | 10.1 |
| Greece | 78.1 | 2011 | 10.5 |
| Ireland | 77.8 | 2451 | 7.2 |
| Portugal | 77.3 | 1797 | 9.8 |
| Denmark | 77.2 | 2763 | 8.9 |
| United States | 77.2 | 5635 | 15.2 |
| Korea | 76.9 | 1074 | 5.5 |
| Czech Republic | 75.3 | 1298 | 7.5 |
| Mexico | 74.9 | 583 | 6.3 |
| Poland | 74.7 | 744 | 6.5 |
| Slovakia | 73.9 | 777 | 5.9 |
| Hungary | 72.4 | 1115 | 8.3 |
| Turkey | 68.7 | 513 | 7.6 |
1 No doubt, it helped that Pearson’s was a minority government, supported by the NDP.
July 28, 2007
Cancellations
At Strings 2007, one of the things I was curious to hear about was what the old-time supergravity experts thought about the conjectures by Zvi Bern et al about the possible finiteness of supergravity (see here for some previous comments on the subject). So I went around surveying their opinions. To a man (or woman), they were united in the opinion that supergravity would diverge. All that they disagreed about was the loop order at which the divergence would first occur.
Some said 5 loops, based on the hypothetical existence of a harmonic superspace formulation for supergravity. The more linearly-realized supersymmetries you have, the more powerful the convergence properties they impose. If a harmonic superspace formulation, with 24 of the 32 supersymmetries linearly realized, were to exists, this would postpone the first divergence to 5 loops.
Renata Kallosh was betting on 8 loops where, many years ago, she constructed an explicitly -invariant counterterm. Others were betting on 9 loops, due to an argument by Berkovits, to do with pure spinors.
All of them, in other words, had their own pet explanation for the improved convergence properties found by Bern et al but, depending on what they believed was responsible, this would only protect you from divergences up to some finite loop order, well beyond what’s been calculated heretofore.
July 27, 2007
Brouhaha
In case you happened to miss the Scott Thomas Beauchamp “controversy,” which created a veritable firestorm in the Wingnutosphere last week, Jon Swift has a nice rundown.
Me? Well, I had grown weary of The New Republic, and was planning to allow my subscription to lapse. But now I’ve decided to resubscribe. After all, anyone who can show the wingnuts for the batshit crazies that they are can’t be all bad…
July 26, 2007
WebKit and MathML
Dave Morrison always has the coolest toys. Years ago, he was the only person I knew with SSH on his cell phone. So it wasn’t all that surprising that he was the owner of the first iPhone I ever got to fondle.
“Look,” he said, “here’s your blog.”
Sure enough, there was Musings, in all its glory … Or most of it. “No MathML,” he muttered. And, indeed, that’s something that I’ve been muttering about for years. In the two years since it became open-source, WebKit has gained a lot of mindshare. In addition to Safari and the iPhone, it powers Nokia’s mobile browser and even the developers of KHTML have bowed to the inevitable.
So it’s a little disappointing that the WebKit MathML project has gone precisely nowhere. Dave and I discussed the matter, and he even expressed an interest in joining the aforementioned project … if only there were something to join.
So where are the developers interested in implementing MathML in WebKit? Y’all should ta