Differential Forms and Smooth Spaces
Posted by Urs Schreiber
As we have discussed at length in the entry on Transgression, differential graded commutative algebras (DGCAs for short) have a useful relation to presheaves on open subsets of Euclidean spaces (smooth spaces, for short):
- every smooth space has a DGCA of differential forms on it;
- and every DGCA sits inside the algebra of differential forms of some smooth space .
On top of that, every finite dimensional DGCA can be regarded as the Chevalley-Eilenberg algebra of some Lie -algebroid , which linearizes some Lie -groupoid.
Here I want to talk about my expectation that
The smooth space associated to any Lie -algebroid this way plays the role of the space # of the Lie -groupoid integrating .
As motivation and plausibility consideration, recall that
in rational homotopy theory and notably in the work of Getzler and Henriques, one obtains a simplicial space from by defining its collection of -simplices to be the collection of -valued forms on the standard -simplex…
… and notice that with the above and using the Yoneda lemma, we can equivalently think of this as the collection of -simplices in :
Mapping simplices into a smooth space is like computing its fundamental -groupoid , thought of as a Kan-complex. In simple situations, notably when is an ordinary Lie algebra, also the ordinary fundamental (1-)groupoid is of interest. And I think
in this case, where the right hand side simply denotes the one-object groupoid with as its space of morphisms.
I am thinking, that hitting everything you see in sections 6 onwards in Lie -connections (blog, pdf, arXiv) with should have various nice consequences.
I want to better understand how nice exactly. That involves better understanding the properties of these functors
in light of the above expectation.
All help is very much appreciated.
Posted at January 28, 2008 9:35 PM UTC
TrackBack URL for this Entry: http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/1581
Re: Differential Forms and Smooth Spaces
One thing I want to do — and I’d be glad to do it with you — is identify a class of ‘nice’ smooth spaces such that their deRham cohomology matches the real cohomology of their underlying topological space.
Then, given a ‘nice’ smooth group , I would hope to show is a ‘nice’ smooth space, whose cohomology is related to that of in the way we expect.
For example, starting from we should be able to build up smooth spaces by iterating this construction.
I’ve got some of this working using Chen spaces. For example, I know how to form a Chen space from a Chen group .
(I usually say ‘smooth’ instead of ‘Chen’, but I want to emphasize that there are various competing formalisms and I’m using this specific one.)
I haven’t made progress on isolating the ‘nice’ Chen spaces. But Mostow has an important paper on getting a smooth space for a smooth group , and working out its deRham cohomology. He uses a different formalism. Gajer has also done important work on making ’s into diffeological spaces. So, I’m sure some idea like this will work. The challenge is to get a setup where it all works smoothly.
(Pardon the pun.)
Read the post
Smooth 2-Functors and Differential Forms
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: An article on the relation between smooth 2-functors with values in strict 2-groups, and an outline of the big picture that this sits in.
Tracked: February 6, 2008 1:07 PM
Re: Differential Forms and Smooth Spaces
The following just occured to me, which puts my statements here into a larger perspective by relating the smooth space which I am calling not just to the classifying space of , but to the entire universal -bundle.
Recall that I am pointing out (more or less explicitly so far) that for generalized smooth spaces
regarded as sheaves over smooth test domains, we can always form the (strict) fundamental -groupoid
in the essentially obvious way by looking at sheaf homomorphisms
and so on.
(In my latest article with Konrad we define in detail the groupoid of thin-homotopy classes of paths of any smooth space. This has a straightforward generalization to all other flavors of path (-)groupoids of .)
For my following comment I’ll just need , the ordinary fundamental 1-groupoid of .
Now fix some Lie algebra and let be the simply connected Lie group integrating it.
Recall that I am writing
for the smooth space which is defined by the assignment
and that I am claiming that the fundamntal 1-groupoid of this smooth space is
by which I use to denote the one-object groupoid given by the group . (This is supposed to be nothing by the de-nervified version of the standard construction described in On rational homotopy theory and Lie -tegration).
Now let
be the set underlying equipped with the discrete topology, regarded as the smooth space given by the assignment
It is clear that
where the right hand is supposed to denote the “discrete” category (in the cat sense, not in the topology sense) whose space of objects is and which has only identity morphisms.
Finally, write for the generalized smooth space given by itself.
Notice that
is the pair groupoid of , since is simply connected.
Now, notice that we canonically have morphisms of smooth spaces
The first map is just inclusion. The second map sends any function
to its differential
which is indeed a flat -valued 1-form.
Notice that all three smooth spaces we are talking about can be regarded as having functions that form a group. In that sense the above is actually a short exact sequence
By the above, hitting this with yields the short exact sequence of groupoids
As discussed in some length at The inner automorphism 3-group of a strict 2-group
this is the groupoid version of the universal -bundle.
Read the post
Construction of Cocycles for Chern-Simons 3-Bundles
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: On how to interpret the geometric construction by Brylinksi and McLaughlin of Cech cocycles classified by Pontrjagin classes as obstructions to lifts of G-bundles to String(G)-2-bundles.
Tracked: February 12, 2008 1:40 PM
Read the post
What I learned from Urs
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: Bruce Bartlett talks about some aspects of the program of systematically understanding the quantization of Sigma-models in terms of sending parallel transport n-functors to the cobordism representations which encode the quantum field theory of the n-pa...
Tracked: February 26, 2008 3:01 PM
Re: Differential Forms and Smooth Spaces
One thing I want to do — and I’d be glad to do it with you — is identify a class of ‘nice’ smooth spaces such that their deRham cohomology matches the real cohomology of their underlying topological space.
Then, given a ‘nice’ smooth group , I would hope to show is a ‘nice’ smooth space, whose cohomology is related to that of in the way we expect.
For example, starting from we should be able to build up smooth spaces by iterating this construction.
I’ve got some of this working using Chen spaces. For example, I know how to form a Chen space from a Chen group . (I usually say ‘smooth’ instead of ‘Chen’, but I want to emphasize that there are various competing formalisms and I’m using this specific one.)
I haven’t made progress on isolating the ‘nice’ Chen spaces. But Mostow has an important paper on getting a smooth space for a smooth group , and working out its deRham cohomology. He uses a different formalism. Gajer has also done important work on making ’s into diffeological spaces. So, I’m sure some idea like this will work. The challenge is to get a setup where it all works smoothly.
(Pardon the pun.)