Axiomatic Set Theory 8: Well Ordered Sets
Posted by Tom Leinster
Previously: Part 7.
By this point in the course, we’ve finished the delicate work of assembling all the customary set-theoretic apparatus from the axioms, and we’ve started proving major theorems. This week, we met well ordered sets and developed all the theory we’ll need. The main results were:
every family of well ordered sets has a least member — informally, “the well ordered sets are well ordered”;
the Hartogs theorem: for every set , there’s some well ordered set that doesn’t admit an injection into ;
a very close relative of Zorn’s lemma that, nevertheless, doesn’t require the axiom of choice: for every ordered set and function assigning an upper bound to each chain in , there’s some chain such that .
I also included an optional chatty section on the use of transfinite recursion to strip the isolated points from any subset of . Am I right in understanding that this is what got Cantor started on set theory in the first place?
Posted at November 8, 2024 12:48 PM UTC