## May 18, 2005

### String(n), Part I

#### Posted by Urs Schreiber

I was asked to say something about the meaning of the group $\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$ and about manifolds with string structure.

So here I’ll try to give a somewhat more comprehensive discussion than last time that we talked about this.

First recall the situation for $\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$. A (Riemannian) manifold $M$ is spin or admits a spin structure if spinning particles can consistently propagate on it.

This is the case iff an $\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)$-bundle

(1)$\begin{array}{c}E\\ ↓\\ M\end{array}$

over the manifold can be lifted to a $\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$-bundle, where $Spin\left(n\right)$ is (of course) the central extension of $\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)$ by ${ℤ}_{2}$:

(2)$1\to {ℤ}_{2}\to \mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)\to \mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)\to 1\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}.$

And this is the case iff $M$ is orientable and the second Stiefel-Whitney class ${w}_{2}\left(E\right)\in {H}^{1}\left(M;ℤ/2\right)$ vanishes.

The situation for $\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$ is similar, but with everything lifted by one dimension. A manifold is string or admits a string structure if spinning strings can consistently propagate on it.

This is the case iff a principal loop-group $L\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)$-bundle

(3)$\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{LE}\\ ↓\\ \mathrm{LM}\end{array}$

over the free loop space $\mathrm{LM}$ can be lifted to a $\stackrel{^}{L\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)}$-bundle, where $\stackrel{^}{L\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)}$ is a (Kac-Moody-)central extension of $L\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)$ by $U\left(1\right)$:

(4)$1\to U\left(1\right)\to \stackrel{^}{L\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)}\to L\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)\to 1\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}.$

And this is the case iff the so-called string class of $\mathrm{LM}$ in ${H}^{3}\left(\mathrm{LM};ℤ\right)$ vanishes.

These two conditions on the topology of $\mathrm{LM}$ can equivalently be formulated in terms of $M$ itself:

1) The vanishing of the string class in ${H}^{3}\left(\mathrm{LM};ℤ\right)$ is equivalent to the vanishing of the Pontryagin class $\frac{1}{2}{p}_{1}\left(E\right)$ of any vector bundle associated to a principal $\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$-bundle $E\to M$.

The string class in ${H}^{3}\left(\mathrm{LM};ℤ\right)$ is obtained from the Pontryagin class ${p}_{1}/2$ by transgression. This means that it is represented by the 3-form

(5)${\int }_{\gamma }{\mathrm{ev}}^{*}\left(\xi \right)\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}},$

where $\xi$ is a representative of ${p}_{1}/2$, ${\mathrm{ev}}^{*}$ is the pull-back by the evaluation map

(6)$\begin{array}{ccc}\mathrm{ev}:\mathrm{LM}×{S}^{1}& \to & M\\ \left(\gamma ,\sigma \right)& ↦& \gamma \left(\sigma \right)\end{array}$

and ${\int }_{\gamma }$ denotes the integral over the ${S}^{1}$-factor in $\mathrm{LM}×{S}^{1}$.

2) This again is equivalent to the existence of a lift of the structure group of $E$ from $\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$ to the topological group called $\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$.

The group $\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$ (or rather a ‘realization’ thereof) is defined as a topological group all of whose homotopy groups equal those of $\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$, except for the third one, which has to vanish for $\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$:

(7)${\pi }_{k}\left(\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)\right)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}{\pi }_{k}\left(\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)\right)& \mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}k\ne 3\\ 1& \mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}k=3\end{array}$

Why this makes sense is best made plausible by looking at the first few homotopy groups of $\mathrm{O}\left(n\right)$. For $n>8$ they start as follows:

(8)$\begin{array}{ccccccccc}k=& 0& 1& 2& 3& 4& 5& 6& 7\\ {\pi }_{k}\left(\mathrm{O}\left(n\right)\right)=& ℤ/2& ℤ/2& 0& ℤ/2& 0& 0& 0& ℤ\end{array}$

We get from $\mathrm{O}\left(n\right)$ to $\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)$ by ‘killing’ the 0th homotopy group, i.e. by going to the connected component.

We get from $\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)$ to $\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$ by ‘killing’ the 1st homotopy group, i.e. by going to the universal cover.

We get from $\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$ to $\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$ by ‘killing’ the next nonvanishing homotopy group, which is the 3rd.

Since every simple Lie group has ${\pi }_{3}=ℤ$ it follows that $\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$ cannot be a Lie group. It is only a topological group. (Meaning that it is a topological space on which the group multiplication acts as a continuous map, but that there is no smooth structure with respect to which the group operation were smooth.)

It can be shown and is well known that an equivalent way to define (a realization of) the group $\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$ is as the topological group which makes this sequence of groups exact:

(9)$1\to K\left(ℤ,2\right)\to \mathrm{String}\left(n\right)\to \mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)\to 1\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}.$

Here $K\left(ℤ,2\right)$ denotes (a realization of) the Eilenberg-MacLane space $K\left(ℤ,2\right)$, which is by definition a topological space all whose homotopy groups vanish, except for the second one, which is isomorphic to $ℤ$. In general

(10)${\pi }_{k}\left(K\left(G,n\right)\right)\simeq \left\{\begin{array}{cc}G& \mathrm{for}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}k=n\\ 1& \mathrm{otherwise}\end{array}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}},$

by definition.

The importance of string structures in string theory results from the fact that superstrings are nothing but ‘spinning strings’, i.e. fermions on loop space, and that their quantum equations of motion are nothing but a generalized Dirac equation on loop space. (The 0-mode of the worldsheet supercharge is a generalized Dirac(-Ramond) operator on loop space (for the closed string).)

It hence follows by the above discussion that superstrings can propagate consistently only on manifolds which are string, just like an ordinary point-like fermion can propagate consistently only on a manifold that is spin.

More technically, the wavefunction of a point-like fermion is really a section of a $\stackrel{^}{\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)}\simeq \mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$-bundle and hence such a bundle needs to exist over spacetime in order for the fermion to exists.

Similarly, the wavefunction of a fermionic string (‘spinning string’) is really a section of a $\stackrel{^}{L\mathrm{SO}\left(n\right)}$-bundle over loop space, and hence such a bundle needs to exist over the loop space over spacetime for fermionic strings to exist.

For instance the worldsheet supercharge of the heterotic string is a Dirac operator on loop space for fermions that are also ‘charged’ under an $\mathrm{SO}\left(32\right)$- or ${E}_{8}×{E}_{8}$-bundle

(11)$\begin{array}{c}V\\ ↓\\ M\end{array}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}.$

In $K$-theory one can form the difference bundle

(12)$E=V-T\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}},$

where $T$ is the tangent bundle and the condition for this bundle to admit a string structure is that the Pontryagin class vanishes, i.e. that

(13)${p}_{2}\left(V\right)-{p}_{1}\left(T\right)=0\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}.$

This is in fact the relation which follows from the cancellation of the perturbative anomaly of the effective $\mathrm{SO}\left(32\right)$- or ${E}_{8}×{E}_{8}$-field theory obtained from these strings. Hence this famous anomaly is related to the fact that heterotic strings are spinors on loop space.

(This entry is continued in part II.)

Posted at May 18, 2005 9:58 AM UTC

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/570

### Re: String(n), Part I

If String(n) is not a Lie group, does it mean that it has no Lie algebra which can be used to describe it locally? I would find an explicit description in terms of Lie brackets illuminating.

### Lie Description of String(n)

If $\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$ is not a Lie group, does it mean that it has no Lie algebra which can be used to describe it locally?

Yes.

I would find an explicit description in terms of Lie brackets illuminating.

$\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$ itself cannot have such a description, directly. But the result which I reviewed in part II is something like the next best thing one can have.

This result says that the unwieldy, non-Lie group $\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$ is what you get by starting with a nice Lie 2-group ${𝒫}_{1}\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$ and taking its ‘nerve’.

The strict Lie 2-algebra of ${𝒫}_{1}\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$ is easily written down. It consists just of the Lie algebra of paths in $\mathrm{𝔰𝔬}\left(n\right)$, the Lie algebra of the Kac-Moody central extension of level 1 of loops ${\ell }_{i}$ in $\mathrm{𝔰𝔬}\left(n\right)$:

(1)$\left[\left({\ell }_{1},{c}_{1}\right),\left({\ell }_{2},{c}_{2}\right)\right]=\left(\left[{\ell }_{1},{\ell }_{2}\right]\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}},{\int }_{0}^{2\pi }⟨{\ell }_{1},\ell {\prime }_{2}⟩\right)$

as well as the obvious action $d\alpha \left(p\right)$ of paths $p$ on centrally extended loops $\left(\ell ,c\right)$

(2)$d\alpha \left(p\right)\left(\ell ,c\right)=\left(\left[p,\ell \right]\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}},{\int }_{0}^{2\pi }⟨p,\ell \prime ⟩\right)\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}.$

Here $p:\left[0,2\pi \right]\to \mathrm{𝔰𝔬}\left(n\right)$ is a based path, $\ell :\left[0,2\pi \right]\to \mathrm{𝔰𝔬}\left(n\right)$ a based loop, the brackets of these are pointwise brackets in $\mathrm{𝔰𝔬}\left(n\right)$ and ${c}_{i}\in \mathrm{Lie}\left(ℝ\right)$ are real numbers coming from the central extension. $⟨\cdot ,\cdot ⟩$ is the Killing form of $\mathrm{𝔰𝔬}\left(n\right)$ with a certain normalization chosen.

This infinite-dimensional Lie 2-algebra turns out to be equivalent to a very simple but non-strict Lie 2-algebra called ${\mathrm{𝔰𝔬}}_{\left(k=1\right)}\left(n\right)$, namely that consisting just of $\mathrm{𝔰𝔬}\left(n\right)$ and the trivial $\mathrm{Lie}\left(ℝ\right)$ with trivial action of the first on the latter, but with a slightly non-trivial Jacobiator given by $J\left(x,y,z\right)=⟨x,\left[y,z\right]⟩$ which relates the two sides of the Jacobi identity (which does hold) by an additional isomorphism.

So there is a path from a very manageable semistrict Lie 2-algebra

(3)${\mathrm{𝔰𝔬}}_{\left(k=1\right)}\left(n\right)$

to the infinite dimensional but strict Lie 2-algebra

(4)${𝒫}_{1}\mathrm{𝔰𝔬}\left(n\right)$

to the associated strict Lie 2-group

(5)${𝒫}_{1}\mathrm{Spin}\left(n\right)$

to the unwieldy topological group

(6)$\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}.$

In a sense, all of the information about $\mathrm{String}\left(n\right)$ is encoded already in ${\mathrm{𝔰𝔬}}_{\left(k=1\right)}\left(n\right)$.

The details of this are described in math.QA/0504123.

Posted by: Urs Schreiber on May 20, 2005 12:34 PM | Permalink | Reply to this
Read the post Seminar on 2-Vector Bundles and Elliptic Cohomology, I
Weblog: The String Coffee Table
Excerpt: Review of the 2-vector approach towards elliptic cohomology. Part I.
Tracked: February 2, 2006 7:01 PM
Read the post Remarks on String(n)-Connections
Weblog: The String Coffee Table
Excerpt: Is Stolz/Teichner's String-connection a 2-connection in an associated 2-bundle?
Tracked: March 11, 2006 3:14 PM
Read the post Stevenson, Henriques on String(n)
Weblog: The String Coffee Table
Excerpt: Stevenson and Henriques have articles on the String group.
Tracked: March 23, 2006 9:27 AM
Read the post Jurco on Gerbes and Stringy Applications
Weblog: The String Coffee Table
Excerpt: Jurco reviews some facts concerning nonabelian gerbes in string theory.
Tracked: April 19, 2006 11:37 AM
Read the post Talk in Bonn on the String 2-Group
Weblog: The String Coffee Table
Excerpt: Talk on the String 2-Group in Bonn.
Tracked: April 26, 2006 8:22 PM
Read the post Seminar on 2-Vector Bundles and Elliptic Cohomology, VI
Weblog: The String Coffee Table
Excerpt: More detials on elliptic curves, formal groups and "classical" elliptic cohomology.
Tracked: July 14, 2006 12:20 PM
Read the post 10D SuGra 2-Connection
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: On the Lie 2-algebra governing 10-dimensional supergravity.
Tracked: August 28, 2006 3:49 PM
Read the post Puzzle Pieces falling into Place
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: On the 3-group which should be underlying Chern-Simons theory.
Tracked: September 28, 2006 3:17 PM
Read the post Topology in Trondheim and Kro, Baas & Bökstedt on 2-Vector Bundles
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: Baas, Dundas and Kro with new insights into 2-vector bundles.
Tracked: October 18, 2006 5:26 PM
Read the post A 3-Category of twisted Bimodules
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: A 3-category of twisted bimodules.
Tracked: November 3, 2006 2:09 PM
Read the post Globular Extended QFT of the Charged n-Particle: String on BG
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: The string on the classifying space of a strict 2-group.
Tracked: January 26, 2007 2:59 PM
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: A conference on bundles and gerbes, another one on topology, and comments on associated 2-vector bundles and String connections.
Tracked: April 19, 2007 8:57 PM
Read the post Lie n-Algebra Cohomology
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: On characteristic classes of n-bundles.
Tracked: September 7, 2007 6:14 PM
Read the post Obstructions for n-Bundle Lifts
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: On obstructions to lifting the structure n-group of n-bundles.
Tracked: September 13, 2007 6:49 PM
Read the post Basic Bundle Theory and K-Cohomology Invariants
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: A book on bundle theory and K-cohomology.
Tracked: December 17, 2007 12:12 PM
Read the post Lie oo-Connections and their Application to String- and Chern-Simons n-Transport
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: A discussion of connections for general L-infinity algebras and their application to String- and Chern-Simons n-transport.
Tracked: December 25, 2007 7:40 PM
Read the post String- and Fivebrane-Structures
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: A new article on String- and Fivebrane structures and some previous articles on Fivebrane structures.
Tracked: October 14, 2008 10:15 PM

Post a New Comment