Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

July 18, 2026

Octonions and the Standard Model (Part 15)

Posted by John Baez

Last time I described a way to get the Standard Model gauge group from the exceptional Jordan algebra. But that approach gave no obvious nice way to put the quarks and leptons into the picture. This new paper tackles that problem:

Jordan pairs and Jordan triples are two closely linked formalisms that generalize Jordan algebras. Our paper explains them in detail — and how they’re connected to geometry and quantum mechanics. Here I will mostly skip that wonderful story, so I can quickly explain the connection to the Standard Model.

Here’s how the Standard Model gauge group, together with its representation on one generation of fermions, drops out of a Jordan triple.

The bi-Cayley triple

Let

𝕆 = 𝕆\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{C} = \mathbb{C} \textstyle{\otimes}_\mathbb{R} \mathbb{O}

be the bioctonions: octonions with complex coefficients. Write 𝕆 2\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{C}^2 for the space of column vectors with two bioctonion entries.

𝕆 2\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{C}^2 has a certain triple product

[x,y,z]=12(x(y z)+z(y x)) [x,y,z]=\frac{1}{2}(x(y^{\dagger}z)+z(y^{\dagger}x))

which obey the axioms of a gadget called a ‘positive hermitian Jordan triple’. It’s called the bi-Cayley triple.

Now, every positive hermitian Jordan triple gives rise to a 2\mathbb{Z}_2-graded real Lie algebra

k=k 0k 1 \mathbf{k} = \mathbf{k}_0 \textstyle{\oplus} \mathbf{k}_1

Not a Lie superalgebra: a plain old-fashioned Lie algebra with a 2\mathbb{Z}_2-grading! The hermitian Jordan triple itself is k 1\mathbf{k}_1. The Lie algebra k 0\mathbf{k}_0, cooked up from the Jordan triple in a certain way, acts on it.

From this situation we get two Lie groups: a big one KK whose Lie algebra is k\mathbf{k}, and a little one K 0K_0, called the whose Lie algebra is k 0\mathbf{k}_0. The quotient is K/K 0K/K_0 is a nice kind of manifold called a hermitian symmetric space. Conversely, any compact hermitian symmetric space give rise to a positive hermitian Jordan triple!

This geometric picture is revealing. The group KK acts transitively as symmetries of our hermitian symmetric space, while the stabilizer of any point is isomorphic to K 0K_0. Our original Jordan triple, k 1\mathbf{k}_1, is then the tangent space of that point. So, K 0K_0 acts on the Jordan triple. This action preserves the triple product, and we call K 0K_0 the real inner automorphism group of our Jordan triple.

Here’s another great thing about the geometric picture: hermitian symmetric spaces were classified by Eli Cartan (who seems to have spent his life classifying things). As a result we also know the classification of positive hermitian Jordan triples. They come in four infinite series together with two exceptions. One is the bi-Cayley triple, and other is the Albert triple, which is the complexification of the exceptional Jordan algebra. The bi-Cayley triple is a subtriple of the Albert triple. It’s these two exceptions that are connected to the Standard Model.

The 3-graded Lie algebra coming from the bi-Cayley triple is the compact real form of 𝔢 6\mathfrak{e}_6:

𝔢 6=[𝔰𝔬(10)𝔲(1)]𝕆 2.\mathfrak{e}_6 = \big[\mathfrak{so}(10) \textstyle{\oplus} \mathfrak{u}(1)\big] \textstyle{\oplus} \mathbb{O}_\mathbb{C}^2.

The even part of this Lie algebra is in brackets. The corresponding hermitian symmetric space is called the bioctonionic plane (𝕆)P 2(\mathbb{C}\otimes\mathbb{O})P^2. I explained it in Part 12. The even part of our 3-graded Lie algebra, 𝔰𝔬(10)𝔲(1)\mathfrak{so}(10)\oplus \mathfrak{u}(1), generates the stabilizer of a point in the bioctonionic plane. The odd part, 𝕆 2\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{C}^2, is the tangent space of that point.

Here’s the first big surprise. The even part transforms as the adjoint representation of Spin(10)\mathrm{Spin}(10), while the odd part itself transforms as the 16-dimensional complex spinor representation of Spin(10)\mathrm{Spin}(10). Ignoring the extra U(1)\mathrm{U}(1) for a moment, this is exactly what we see in a SO(10)\mathrm{SO}(10) grand unified theory: gauge bosons in the adjoint representation, and one generation of fermions in the 16-dimensional spinor representation.

So before we do anything, the bi-Cayley triple already smells like it contains the ingredients of an SO(10)\mathrm{SO}(10) grand unified theory.

Tripotents

In a Jordan algebra the important elements are the idempotents, e 2=ee^2 = e. In a Jordan triple WW their role is played by tripotents: elements ee with

[e,e,e]=e.[e,e,e] = e.

A tripotent always lets us split WW into three parts via something called its Peirce decomposition. The operator w[e,e,w]w \mapsto [e,e,w] has eigenvalues 0,12,10, \tfrac{1}{2}, 1, and WW splits into the corresponding eigenspaces

W=W 0(e)W 1/2(e)W 1(e),W = W_0(e) \textstyle{\oplus} W_{1/2}(e) \textstyle{\oplus} W_1(e),

which are called the Peirce 0-space, Peirce 12\tfrac{1}{2}-space and Peirce 1-space of ee. A tripotent is called minimal when its Peirce 11-space is one-dimensional: minimal tripotents are the analogues of unit vectors in ordinary quantum theory. Two tripotents e 1,e 2e_1, e_2 are called colinear when each lies in the other’s Peirce 12\tfrac{1}{2}-space.

The single fact driving everything below is this: a minimal tripotent’s Peirce 12\tfrac{1}{2}-space is itself a hermitian Jordan triple. If we run this starting from the bi-Cayley triple, we get a chain of hermitian Jordan triples, where each row’s 12\tfrac{1}{2}-space is the next row’s triple:

Jordan triple Lie algebra k 0k 1\mathbf{k}_0 \oplus \mathbf{k}_1 (even part in brackets) real inner automorphism group
W=𝕆 2W = \mathbb{O}_\mathbb{C}^2 𝔢 6=[𝔰𝔬(10)𝔲(1)]𝕆 2\mathfrak{e}_6 = [\mathfrak{so}(10) \oplus \mathfrak{u}(1)] \oplus \mathbb{O}_\mathbb{C}^2 (Spin(10)×U(1))/ 4(\mathrm{Spin}(10) \times \mathrm{U}(1)) / \mathbb{Z}_4
W=𝔞 5()W' = \mathfrak{a}_5(\mathbb{C}) 𝔰𝔬(10)=[𝔰𝔲(5)𝔲(1)]𝔞 5()\mathfrak{so}(10) = [\mathfrak{su}(5) \oplus \mathfrak{u}(1)] \oplus \mathfrak{a}_5(\mathbb{C}) SU(5)×U(1)\mathrm{SU}(5) \times \mathrm{U}(1)
W=M 3,2()W'' = \mathrm{M}_{3,2}(\mathbb{C}) 𝔰𝔲(5)=[𝔤 SM]M 3,2()\mathfrak{su}(5) = [\mathfrak{g}_{\mathrm{SM}}] \oplus \mathrm{M}_{3,2}(\mathbb{C}) G SMG_{\mathrm{SM}}

Here 𝔞 5()\mathfrak{a}_5(\mathbb{C}) is the Jordan triple of antisymmetric 5×55\times 5 complex matrices, M 3,2()\mathrm{M}_{3,2}(\mathbb{C}) is the Jordan triple of 3×23\times 2 complex matrices, 𝔤 SM=𝔰𝔲(3)𝔰𝔲(2)𝔲(1)\mathfrak{g}_{\mathrm{SM}} = \mathfrak{su}(3)\oplus\mathfrak{su}(2)\oplus \mathfrak{u}(1), and

G SM=S(U(2)×U(3))(SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1))/ 6G_{\mathrm{SM}} = \mathrm{S}(\mathrm{U}(2) \times \mathrm{U}(3)) \cong (\mathrm{SU}(3)\times\mathrm{SU}(2)\times\mathrm{U}(1))/\mathbb{Z}_6

is the true Standard Model gauge group.

The gauge group from two tripotents

Now pick two colinear minimal tripotents e 1,e 2We_1, e_2 \in W. Descend the table twice:

  • Start with W=𝕆 2W = \mathbb{O}_\mathbb{C}^2, which has real inner automorphism group (Spin(10)×U(1))/ 4(\mathrm{Spin}(10)\times\mathrm{U}(1))/\mathbb{Z}_4.
  • Fix e 1e_1. Its Peirce 12\tfrac{1}{2}-space is W=𝔞 5()W' = \mathfrak{a}_5(\mathbb{C}), with real inner automorphism group SU(5)×U(1)\mathrm{SU}(5)\times\mathrm{U}(1).
  • Fix e 2e_2 (colinear with e 1e_1, so living in WW'). Its Peirce 12\tfrac{1}{2}-space in WW' is W=M 3,2()W'' = \mathrm{M}_{3,2}(\mathbb{C}), with real inner automorphism group exactly G SMG_{\mathrm{SM}}.

In other words, the subspace of WW colinear with both e 1e_1 and e 2e_2 is M 3,2()\mathrm{M}_{3,2}(\mathbb{C}), and its real inner automorphism group is the Standard Model gauge group.

The choice of e 1e_1 and e 2e_2 also pins down how G SMG_{\mathrm{SM}} sits inside the original group E 6\mathrm{E}_6. At each we step take the subgroup that acts with determinant 11 and preserves the chosen tripotent up to a phase; this gives a chain of subgroups whose members are Spin(10)\mathrm{Spin}(10), U(5)\mathrm{U}(5), and G SMG_{\mathrm{SM}}, so we get the embedding

G SMSU(5)Spin(10). G_{\mathrm{SM}} \subset \mathrm{SU}(5) \subset \mathrm{Spin}(10).

In particle physics, this is the classic Georgi–Glashow chain. And it’s well known that restricting the 16-dimensional complex spinor representation of Spin(10)\mathrm{Spin}(10) along this chain gives precisely the Standard Model representation ρ SM\rho_{\mathrm{SM}} on one generation of fermions! So we get this representation too.

The six particles types as Peirce spaces

Here’s the part I find most charming. As a representation of the Standard Model Lie algebra

𝔤 SM=𝔰𝔲(3)𝔰𝔲(2)𝔲(1),\mathfrak{g}_{\mathrm{SM}} = \mathfrak{su}(3) \textstyle{\oplus} \mathfrak{su}(2) \textstyle{\oplus} \mathfrak{u}(1) ,

any generation of Standard Model fermions transforms as the direct sum of six irreducible representations:

ρ SM=(3,2,16)(3¯,1,13)(3¯,1,23)(1,2,12)(1,1,1)(1,1,0),\rho_{\mathrm{SM}} = (3,2,\tfrac{1}{6}) \textstyle{\oplus} (\bar 3,1,\tfrac{1}{3}) \textstyle{\oplus} (\bar 3,1,-\tfrac{2}{3}) \textstyle{\oplus} (1,2,-\tfrac{1}{2}) \textstyle{\oplus} (1,1,1) \textstyle{\oplus} (1,1,0),

These correspond to the six types of left-handed fermion: q L,d R¯,u R¯, L,e R¯,ν R¯q_L, \overline{d_R}, \overline{u_R}, \ell_L, \overline{e_R}, \overline{\nu_R}. Six irreducible pieces, six particle types.

It turns out these are exactly the six nonzero components of the Peirce decomposition of 𝕆 2\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{C}^2 with respect to both e 1e_1 and e 2e_2. Those six match up one-to-one with the particle types:

Peirce projector representation of G SMG_{\text{SM}} particle type
P1/2(e2) P1/2(e1) (3, 2, +1/6) q Lq_L
P1/2(e2) P0(e1) (3¯\overline{3}, 1, +1/3) d R¯\overline{d_R}
P0(e2) P1/2(e1) (3¯\overline{3}, 1, −2/3) u R¯\overline{u_R}
P0(e2) P0(e1) (1, 2, −1/2) L\ell_L
P1(e2) P1/2(e1) (1, 1, +1) e R¯\overline{e_R}
P1/2(e2) P1(e1) (1, 1, 0) ν R¯\overline{\nu_R}

The remaining three combinations — P 1(e 2)P 1(e 1)P_1(e_2)P_1(e_1), P 1(e 2)P 0(e 1)P_1(e_2)P_0(e_1), and P 0(e 2)P 1(e 1)P_0(e_2)P_1(e_1) — all vanish, which is why we land on six pieces and not nine.

So the whole package — the gauge group G SMG_{\mathrm{SM}}, the embedding G SMSpin(10)G_{\mathrm{SM}} \subset \mathrm{Spin}(10), the representation ρ SM\rho_{\mathrm{SM}}, and even the split of one generation into its six particle multiplets as distinct Peirce components — all comes out of the single object 𝕆 2\mathbb{O}_\mathbb{C}^2 once you choose two colinear minimal tripotents.

And if you prefer to start one level up, with the Albert triple 𝔥 3(𝕆)\mathfrak{h}_3(\mathbb{O}) \otimes \mathbb{C}, you get the same result by choosing three mutually colinear tripotents instead of two — but for that, read our paper!

Posted at July 18, 2026 5:56 PM UTC

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/3637

0 Comments & 0 Trackbacks

Post a New Comment