Higher Hochschild Cohomology and Differential Forms on Mapping Spaces
Posted by Urs Schreiber
A while ago I had visited Grégory Ginot in Paris. He is an expert on string topology which is, despite its name, the study of the real homology of loop spaces.
The deRham cohomology of a loop space is is captured already by those differential forms on which are Chen iterated integrals: transgressions of forms through the correspondence induced by the obvious inclusion . (see page 13 of Getzler, Jones and Petrack).
Acting with the loop space differential on such an iterated integral form is the same as acting with the differential on on each of the , and then wedging all subsequent pairs of s.
This second operation happens to be nothing but the Hochschild differential for the algebra with values in itself.
It is famously known that the Hochschild cohomology of computes the homology of the loop space of , and I had thought of Chen’s iterated integrals as a good explanation for why that is the case.
But there should be an even nicer and even more conceptual point of view.
As you can read summarized concisely in
Grégory Ginot
Higher order Hochschild cohomology
(pdf)
one can understand the Hochschild differential as being essentially the differential on certain simplicial differential forms, where the simplicial structure is obtained by choosing the standard simplicial model of the circle by a single 1-simplex:
As apparently Pirashvili pointed out first, from any simplicial set and any functor we obtain a simplicial vector space and hence, by Dold-Kan, a complex. This is such that if we take to be the functor induced by an algebra , which sends and uses product and unit of the algebra to reflect surjective and injective maps of sets, and if we take to be the standard simplicial model of the circle, then the complex obtained from is literally the Hochschild complex of .
That’s nice, because it suggests that we can vastly generalize Hochschild cohomology by using Pirashvili’s method, but using for a simplicial model of some higher dimensional space , instead.
And it works: the cohomology of one obtains for this way does compute the homology of the mapping space . See Grégory’s article for history, background, references, results and proofs.
What are the higher order Chen-iterated integrals that correspond to this higher order Hochschild cohomology?
Posted at April 18, 2008 7:21 PM UTC
Re: Higher Hochschild Cohomology and Differential Forms on Mapping Spaces
this is not a comment to the blog post, but i was rushed and this was the quickest way to contact the blog owners.
i am so excited to have stumbled upon your blog… and while i only understand about 2% of it (and that 2% is mostly the fact that it’s written in english), i still can’t wait until i have time later this evening to look it all over.
i just recently returned back to school to further my education, as i have been studying philosophy and the history of mathematics on my own for the last year. what began as a simple reading of “death by blackhole” became me reading math textbooks and science journals for fun. i reached a point where i realised that in order to fully grasp the concepts i was reading about- i needed to be fully schooled in mathematics. so, while i already have a BA, i am returning to school to receive a BS in mathematics, and a simultaneous degree (BA) in philosophy. my goal is to enter the doctorate program in mathematics with a focus on pure mathematics.
you’d be surprised though, by the looks i’ve gotten from both the philosophy department and the math department when i say i want to study the ‘philosophy of mathematics’. i am basically having to work with the heads of the depts. to forge my own program… but i’m passionate about the subject (even if my passion outweighs my understanding).
kudos on the blog- and thank you, because it’s nice to know i’m not alone…