Most kinds of exact completion, including categories of sheaves, are a special case of a reflection from certain sites into higher-ary exact categories.
An internal axiomatization of factorization systems, subtoposes, local toposes, and cohesive toposes in homotopy type theory, using “higher modality” and codiscreteness.
Categories of spaces with discrete and codiscrete objects are closely related to fibrations and opfibrations; the “scone” freely adds both codiscrete objects and cartesian arrows.
A homotopical extension of the notion of “inductive definition” allows us to construct CW complexes and mimic other constructions from homotopy theory in type theory.
guest post by David Roberts This post is about my forthcoming paper, extracted from chapter 1 of my thesis: Internal categories, anafunctors and localisations and is also a bit of a call for examples from n-category cafe visitors (see…
The calculus of exact squares for computing with Kan extensions isn’t well-known in some circles, but it has the advantage of generalizing well to derivators and (∞,1)-categories.
By using homotopy 2-categories and derivators, we can squeeze a lot of information out of (infinity,1)-categories using only comparatively easy 2-categorical machinery.
An easier-to-understand description of the left adjoint to the homotopy coherent nerve, due to Dugger and Spivak, enables us to make explicit computations of its hom-spaces, and better understand the relationship between quasicategories and simplicial categories.
The still-hypothetical notion of “extraordinary 2-multicategory” generalizes a 2-category just enough to include extraordinary natural transformations.
Structural set theories such as ETCS provide an alternate foundation for mathematics, which is arguably closer to mathematical practice than ZF-like “material” set theories.
A clever Yoneda argument shows that modulo size concerns, if completeness lifts to categories of algebras, then so do all individual limits. It’s interesting to compare how different approaches to size deal with this.
(Strong) Feferman set theory provides a set-theoretic foundation for category theory that avoids many of the problems with other approaches such as Grothendieck universes.
An enhanced structure on a 2-category, called a “proarrow equipment,” lets us define weighted limits and develop a good deal of “formal category theory.”
Guest post by Emily Riehl A popular slogan is that (∞,1)-categories (also called quasi-categories or ∞-categories) sit somewhere between categories and spaces, combining some of the features of both. The analogy with spaces is fairly clear, at least to…