Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

May 26, 2010

Nonabelian Cohomology in Three (∞,1)-Toposes

Posted by Urs Schreiber

For X a topological space and A an ∞-groupoid, the standard way to define the nonabelian cohomology of X with coefficients in A is to define it as the intrinsic cohomology as seen in ∞Grpd Top:

H(X,A):=π 0Top(X,A)π 0Func(SingX,A),

where A is the geometric realization of A and SingX the fundamental ∞-groupoid of X.

But both X and A here naturally can be regarded, in several ways, as objects of (∞,1)-sheaf (∞,1)-toposes H=Sh (,1)(C) over nontrivial (∞,1)-sites C. The intrinsic cohomology of such H is a nonabelian sheaf cohomology.

The following discusses two such choices for H such that the corresponding nonabelian sheaf cohomology coincides with H(X,A) (for paracompact X).

Petit (,1)-sheaf (,1)-topos

For X a topological space and Op(X) its category of open subsets equipped with the canonical structure of an (∞,1)-site, let

H:=Sh (,1)(X):=Sh (,1)(Op(X))

be the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves on X. The space X itself is naturally identified with the terminal object X=*Sh (,1)(X). This is the petit topos incarnation of X.

Write

(LConstΓ):Sh (,1)(X)ΓLConstGrpd

for the global sections terminal geometric morphism.

Under the constant (∞,1)-sheaf functor LConst an ∞-groupoid AGrpd is regarded as an object LConstASh (,1)(X).

There is therefore the intrinsic cohomology of the (,1)-topos Sh (,1)(X) with coefficients in the constant (∞,1)-sheaf on A

H(X,A):=π 0Sh (,1)(X)(X,LConstA).

Notice that since X is in fact the terminal object of Sh (,1)(X) and that Sh (,1)(X)(X,) is the global sections functor, this is equivalently

π 0ΓLConstA.

Theorem (Jacob Lurie)

If X is a paracompact space, then these two definitins of nonabelian cohomology of X with constant coefficients AGrpd agree:

H(X,A):=π 0Grpd(SingX,A)Sh (,1)(X)(X,LConstA).

This is theorem 7.1.0.1 in Higher Topos Theory.

Gros (,1)-sheaf (,1)-topos

Another alternative is to regard the space X as an object in the gros (∞,1)-sheaf topos Sh (,1)(CartSp) over the site CartSp, as described at ∞-Lie groupoid. This has the special property that it is a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos, which means that the terminal geometric morphism is an essential geometric morphism

(ΠLConstΓ):Sh (,1)(CartSp)ΓLConstΠGrpd,

with the further left adjoint Π to LConst being the intrinsic path ∞-groupoid functor . The intrinsic nonabelian cohomology in there also coincides with nonabelian cohomology in Top; even the full cocycle ∞-groupoids are equivalent:

Theorem (my claim)

For a paracompact manifold X we have an equivalence of cocycle ∞-groupoids

Sh (,1)(CartSp)(X,LConstA)Top(X,A)

and hence in particular an isomorphism on cohomology

H(X,A)π 0Sh (,1)(CartSp)(X,LConstA)

Proof

The key point is that for a paracompact manifold X, the nerve theorem asserts that Π(X) is weakly homotopy equivalent to SingX, the standard fundamental ∞-groupoid of X. This is discussed in detail in the section geometric realization at path ∞-groupoid.

Using this, the statement follows by the (∞,1)-adjunction (ΠLConst), that is discussed in detail at Unstructured homotopy ∞-groupoid.

Remark

In fact, for X locally contractible, it should be true that also Sh (,1)(X) is a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos and one can play the same adjunction game here. Then the above amounts to the statement that for X regarded as an object of Sh (,1)(X) we have under the left adjoint Π of LConst that Π(X)Grpd is equivalent to SingX. This is the old Artin-Mazur theorem in slight disguise.

Posted at May 26, 2010 1:26 PM UTC

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/2219

4 Comments & 0 Trackbacks

Re: Nonabelian Cohomology in Three (∞,1)-Toposes

This is a very nice picture.

I can’t resist mentioning another way of looking at the first equivalence. Suppose that X is a locally compact CW complex. In particular, this implies that it is hereditarily m-cofibrant, i.e. every open subset of X has the homotopy type of a CW complex. That’s what you need in order to conclude that taking sheaves of sections of spaces over X is well-behaved homotopically, since only m-cofibrant spaces are good for mapping out of homotopically. You can then prove (see this paper of mine) that the “sheaf of sections” functor

Top/X[Op(X) op,sSet]

is the right adjoint in a right Quillen embedding, i.e. a Quillen adjunction whose derived right adjoint is fully faithful. In other words, the homotopy theory of spaces over X embeds in the homotopy theory of (,1)-sheaves on X. One can also identify its image as consisting of the locally constant (,1)-sheaves. This is a homotopical version of the identification of covering spaces with locally constant 1-sheaves.

Furthermore, if f:XY is a map of such spaces, then the pullback functor f *:Top/YTop/X agrees with the inverse image functor f * for (,1)-sheaves. In particular, when Y is a point and A a space, then the constant (,1)-sheaf Const(A) is identified with (the sheaf of sections of) the space X *A=X×A over X. Therefore, the nonabelian cohomology of X with coefficients in Const(A) is the same as the maps in Top/X from X (the terminal object of Top/X) to X *A. Since the left adjoint of X *:TopTop/X just forgets the structure map to X, this is the same as maps in Top from X to A. Thereby we recover Lurie’s theorem, in the case when X is a locally compact CW complex.

Posted by: Mike Shulman on May 26, 2010 4:13 PM | Permalink | Reply to this

Re: Nonabelian Cohomology in Three (∞,1)-Toposes

Thanks, Mike. I should have mentioned this.

For the time being I moved your comment, only slightly edited, into a new section Nonabelian sheaf cohomology with constant coefficients – In terms of covering spaces at nLab:cohomology.

This should be exanded, but i need to take care of something else for the moment…

Posted by: Urs Schreiber on May 26, 2010 6:01 PM | Permalink | Reply to this

m-cofibrant

m stands for…???

Posted by: jim stasheff on May 27, 2010 1:41 PM | Permalink | Reply to this

Re: m-cofibrant

the ‘m’ in m-cofibrant stands for the mixed model structure. It’s a mash-up of the standard (Quillen) model structure on Top and the Strom model structure.

Posted by: David Roberts on May 28, 2010 1:47 AM | Permalink | Reply to this

Post a New Comment