Category Algebras
Posted by Urs Schreiber
Currently Masoud Khalkali over from Noncommutative Geometry Blog is giving an introductory lecture series on – right – noncommutative geometry, here at the Hausdorff institute.
He is following his notes
Masoud Khalkali
Very basic noncommutative geometry
arXiv:math/0408416 .
Today he started talking about noncommutative algebras arising as groupoid algebras (or “groupoid convolution algebras”, special cases of category algebras, see p. 58) motivating them by their ubiquitousness in noncommutative geometry:
The good news is that most of the noncommutative spaces which are currently in use in noncommutative geometry are constructed by this method.
p. 53
Here I want to use this opportunity to point out how category algebra works from the point of view of groupoidification along the lines of the discussion in An Exercise in Groupoidification: The Path Integral.
For a (finite dimensional) vector space, I write for the category of sets over . An object is a set with a map to ,
and a morphism is a commuting triangle
The -cardinality operation is a monoidal map
sending a finite set labeled by to the sum of the labels of its elements.
Let be the category whose single object is the vector space and whose space of morphisms is , with composition of morphisms being the composition of these endomorphisms.
Take to be any finite category whose category algebra we want to consider. Form the cartesian product category
and consider finite sets over the collection of morphisms:
Notice that for each fixed morphisms of this is an element in . Under the -cardinality it is therefore an -valued function on . If (and assuming we are talking about complex vector spaces), then this is a complex function on .
Given two such sets over
representing two -valued functions on we take the correspondence space given by the composition operation in
pull back both sets and to the total space and take fiberwise cartesian product there to get the new set
and then push that down along the composition map
Under -cardinality, the resulting finite set is the category algebra product of the two original -valued functions on .
We can also discuss the action of this category algebra on -valued functions on in a similar manner:
For a monoid write for the corresponding one-object category. A representation of on is a functor
such that
We write
for the corresponding action category, being the pullback
which has as its space of objects and one morphism of the form
for each and each , with the obvious composition coming from the product in .
For the discussion of category algebras, consider again the monoid and hence the action category . Notice that every -valued set over
pulls back along the canonical projection
to a finite set over .
So consider a -valued set over in the form of a finite set
and then the correspondence space of the category
where is the pullback along the above of an -valued set over representing, by the previous discussion, an element in the category algebra of (with coefficients in ).
Then pull back along the source map to , tensor there with
and then push down along the target map
to get a -valued set over . Under -cardinality, this is the image of the original -valued function represented by under the action of the category algebra element represented by .
The reasoning needed for seeing this is precisely the one used for the disucssion of the path integral in this context.
Posted at June 26, 2008 8:50 PM UTC
TrackBack URL for this Entry: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/1727
Re: Category Algebras
Urs wrote:
> The V-cardinality operation is a monoidal
> map
> ∣⋅∣:(FinSet V,⊕)→(V,+)
> sending a finite set labeled by V to the
> sum of the labels of its elements.
Do you want to put a weight of this sum of elements? For instance if you have a finite group acting on a vector space V you could take the S sitting over v in V to be all the G translates of v and the map would then be 1/|G| \sum gv, i.e. the projection of v on the invariant subspace.