AQFT from Lattice Models (?)
Posted by Urs Schreiber
In AQFT from -functorial QFT (blog, arXiv) I had discussed how -functors on -paths in pseudo-Riemannian spaces give rise to local nets of algebras (or rather, more generally, of monoids) which are taken in algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT) as the definition of the local observables of QFT and indeed of QFT itself.
Now I am thinking about more examples in 2 dimensions.
A good approach would be to try to first handle all known lattice models of AQFT, then understanding the continuum limit. But work in this direction is scarce. One relevant article I am aware of is
Florian Nill, Kornél Szalachányi
Quantum Chains of Hopf Algebras with Quantum Double Cosymmetry
arXiv:hep-th/9509100
They are considering a 1-dimensional lattice where to every second site is assigned a finite dimensional -Hopf algebra and to every other site its dual -Hopf algebra .
A possible 2-functorial interpretation would be to read this as the Heisenberg picture version of what in the Schrödinger picture is a 2-functor
on a causal lattice 2-path 2-category of the form
such that the 1-morphisms assigned to the lower paths
are such that and
Given that, if we furthermore assume the time evolution propagator
on every elementary 2-path be in , the local net obtained from this 2-functor restricted to a horizontal zig-zag path would be a net of the kind discussed by the above authors in section 2.2.
I wasn’t entirely sure how I had to choose the codomain 2-category and the action of the 2-functor on 1-morphisms to achieve that. But luckily, Pasquale Zito kindly provided very helpful comments. He has written
Pasquale A. Zito,
2--categories with non-simple units
arXiv:math/0509266
First of all, quite generally for many common classes of applications the right choice of codomain 2-category should be such that the endomorphism monoid of any 1-morphism is a -algebra. This strongly suggests that the codomain be a 2--category: a category enriched over -categories. You can find the definition of -category for instance in the entry Spaceoids. A -category is a -algebroid. The definition of a 2--category is for instance on p. 7 of Pasquale Zito’s article.
So that much is clear. Less immediate is the following nice fact, which Pasquale Zito discusses in section 5, from p. 39 on:
Let be a 2--category and let be a 1-morphism in there which has a conjugate i.e. such that we have an ambidextrous adjunction.
Then is a Hopf algebra and is its dual. Together they satisfy a bunch of nice properties, for which the source seems to be
Michael Mueger
From Subfactors to Categories and Topology I. Frobenius algebras in and Morita equivalence of tensor categories
arXiv:math/0111204
around p. 45.
So it seems that the “Hopf spin chain” nets discussed by Nill and Szalachányi can be regarded as the nets obtained from 2-functor as above which come from a choice of ambidextrous adjunction in a -category under the assignment and
Re: AQFT from Lattice Models (?)
Thanks for the belated birthday present. June 26 was my birthday :)
“Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen.” - The Emperor
It has always been my experience that taking the discrete theories seriously generally leads to improved understanding and if you do things right, the continuum limit (if one is desired) should be guaranteed.