The names of which pair of Shakespearean characters appear on the astronomer Tycho Brahe’s coat of arms - in the list of his ancestors?
For extra credit: why? (Nobody seems to know.)
Posted at October 1, 2006 6:30 AM UTCTrackBack URL for this Entry: https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/954
The Swedish branch of the Brahe family has even given name to a city in Finland, Brahestad.
Excellent, Tim! I can now improve the answer I had, which went like this:
Q: The names of which pair of Shakespearean characters appear on the astronomer Tycho Brahe’s coat of arms - in the list of his ancestors?
A: Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern. Tycho Brahe was the Danish astronomer whose precise astronomical measurements served as the basis of Kepler’s laws of physics. A portrait of Tycho Brahe contains the names “Rosenkrans” and “Guildensteren” among the ancestors on his coat of arms:
Eric Altschuler of U. C. San Diego has used this and other pieces of evidence to argue that Shakespeare was an astronomer. For example:
“Saturn and Venus in conjunction!” - Henry IV, Part Two.
Source: The Independent, November 5, 1998, p. 7. They cite an article by Altschuler in the online magazine PhysicsWeb, which in turn refers to the following paper:
Personally I found the idea of Shakespeare as an astronomer rather implausible. There’s something about him that drives people a little bit crazy. Instead, I suspect he was just extraordinarily able to pick up a bit of this and a bit of that. Your answer, Tim, helps explain how he could have done it in this case!
The Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges delivered an illuminating lecture on the “enigma of Shakespeare”, i.e., the question of whether William Shakespeare of Stratford actually wrote the plays now known under his name. Several anti-Stratfordians have claimed that Shakespeare’s plays reveal a learning too deep to have been acquired by a country bumpkin. Replying to this charge, Borges said, “[I]t is one thing to use terms from many disciplines and sciences and another thing altogether to have a profound or even superficial knowledge of those same disciplines and sciences.”
The whole lecture is entertaining and informative; Borges argues against the Baconian and Marlowian cases on psychological grounds, even working in a riff on Einsteinian versus Newtonian physics.
I’ve also been pointed at this site, which not only discusses this issue and identifies the relevant ancestors, but also already points both to this discussion and the other one I’ve been involved in! And it also points to you pointing back to it for your picture!
Tim Silverman writes:
And it also points to you pointing back to it for your picture!
Thanks for linking to that site! Bored people surfing the web can now bounce endlessly back and forth! 
And in bouncing back and forth, they can build up momentum and eventually propel their computer beyond the Technological Singularity.
I agree that the idea of Shakespeare as an astronomer is rather implausible, but Shakespeare with an interest in Astrology (if only as a comsumer of other’s output) is very possible, given the frequent references in his plays like the quote above.
If shakespeare was an anstronomer, he would have put in Kepler - he wore the data of TB the best
by the way, the nose in this portrait seems retouched.
Re: Puzzle #2
Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern. By a bizarre coincidence, I was just talking about this on usenet with someone who’s looking into medieval and renaissance Scandinavia for a story she’s writing.
Shakespeare’s characters are assumed to have been based on Frederick Rosenkrantz and Knud Gyldenstierne, who were present on an embassy to England in 1592, and were respectively Tycho’s third cousin and some other sort of cousin.
The Rosenkrantz and Gyldenstierne families were major players in Denmark’s aristocracy over several generations, as were the Brahe family and the Bille family (Tycho’s mother’s family). And, in the words of my usenet interlocutor, “the nobility married amongst themselves a lot.”
She also pointed me to this genealogy. The astronomer is not the Tyge at the top but the one directly under him two generations later.
My other source was (Kitty Ferguson, Tycho and Kepler, Headline Book Publishing, 2002) which talks about Rosenkrantz and Gyldenstierne on pp 261-2.