Staring at the Tea Leaves
LEP closed down in 2000, to make way for the LHC. There were, towards the end, intriguing hints that there was, perhaps, a bit of a bump in the number of b-jet events, indicating the possibility of a Higgs. Arguments were made that the LEP run should be extended. But, in the end, LEP was shut down on schedule, and the consensus was that it had established a lower limit of GeV.
Still, people continue to pore over the data and, recently, Dermisek and Gunion have challenged the above consensus. The limit seems to be rather neatly evaded in the NMSSM1. Rather than the dominant decay being , one expects the dominant decay mode to be , where is a CP-odd boson of mass, GeV. The subsequently decays, . The upshot is that, rather than a big excess of two b-jet events, from , we expect smaller excesses of both two b-jet and four b-jet events (from ). That, according to Dermisek and Gunion, is what’s seen in the LEP data, and is consistent with GeV.
If correct, that’s very bad news for direct detection of the Higgs at the LHC. [As I emphasize to Sean, below we’ll see other stuff, just not a Higgs.]
Update (12/7/2005):
John Gunion chimes in below, with an update to their analysis. In the new “best-fit”, the mass of the is below , so it decays predominantly into , instead of (even worse for detection at the LHC). Their estimate for the Higgs mass is slightly lowered, to GeV.1 In the NMSSM, the parameter is replaces by a singlet field, , which develops an expectation value. The augmented Higgs sector () includes the light pseudoscalar, , above.
Re: Staring at the Tea Leaves
I presume, being no expert, that these points in the NMSSM parameter space would predict plenty of other observable particles, even if “the Higgs” were inaccessible. That wouldn’t be such a disaster; much preferable to finding the Higgs and nothing else.