Nonabelian Cohomology in Three (∞,1)-Toposes
Posted by Urs Schreiber
For a topological space and an ∞-groupoid, the standard way to define the nonabelian cohomology of with coefficients in is to define it as the intrinsic cohomology as seen in ∞Grpd Top:
where is the geometric realization of and the fundamental ∞-groupoid of .
But both and here naturally can be regarded, in several ways, as objects of (∞,1)-sheaf (∞,1)-toposes over nontrivial (∞,1)-sites . The intrinsic cohomology of such is a nonabelian sheaf cohomology.
The following discusses two such choices for such that the corresponding nonabelian sheaf cohomology coincides with (for paracompact ).
Petit -sheaf -topos
For a topological space and its category of open subsets equipped with the canonical structure of an (∞,1)-site, let
be the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves on . The space itself is naturally identified with the terminal object . This is the petit topos incarnation of .
Write
for the global sections terminal geometric morphism.
Under the constant (∞,1)-sheaf functor an ∞-groupoid is regarded as an object .
There is therefore the intrinsic cohomology of the -topos with coefficients in the constant (∞,1)-sheaf on
Notice that since is in fact the terminal object of and that is the global sections functor, this is equivalently
Theorem (Jacob Lurie)
If is a paracompact space, then these two definitins of nonabelian cohomology of with constant coefficients agree:
This is theorem 7.1.0.1 in Higher Topos Theory.
Gros -sheaf -topos
Another alternative is to regard the space as an object in the gros (∞,1)-sheaf topos over the site CartSp, as described at ∞-Lie groupoid. This has the special property that it is a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos, which means that the terminal geometric morphism is an essential geometric morphism
with the further left adjoint to being the intrinsic path ∞-groupoid functor . The intrinsic nonabelian cohomology in there also coincides with nonabelian cohomology in ; even the full cocycle ∞-groupoids are equivalent:
Theorem (my claim)
For a paracompact manifold we have an equivalence of cocycle ∞-groupoids
and hence in particular an isomorphism on cohomology
Proof
The key point is that for a paracompact manifold , the nerve theorem asserts that is weakly homotopy equivalent to , the standard fundamental ∞-groupoid of . This is discussed in detail in the section geometric realization at path ∞-groupoid.
Using this, the statement follows by the (∞,1)-adjunction , that is discussed in detail at Unstructured homotopy ∞-groupoid.
Remark
In fact, for locally contractible, it should be true that also is a locally ∞-connected (∞,1)-topos and one can play the same adjunction game here. Then the above amounts to the statement that for regarded as an object of we have under the left adjoint of that is equivalent to . This is the old Artin-Mazur theorem in slight disguise.
Re: Nonabelian Cohomology in Three (∞,1)-Toposes
This is a very nice picture.
I can’t resist mentioning another way of looking at the first equivalence. Suppose that is a locally compact CW complex. In particular, this implies that it is hereditarily m-cofibrant, i.e. every open subset of has the homotopy type of a CW complex. That’s what you need in order to conclude that taking sheaves of sections of spaces over is well-behaved homotopically, since only m-cofibrant spaces are good for mapping out of homotopically. You can then prove (see this paper of mine) that the “sheaf of sections” functor
is the right adjoint in a right Quillen embedding, i.e. a Quillen adjunction whose derived right adjoint is fully faithful. In other words, the homotopy theory of spaces over embeds in the homotopy theory of -sheaves on . One can also identify its image as consisting of the locally constant -sheaves. This is a homotopical version of the identification of covering spaces with locally constant 1-sheaves.
Furthermore, if is a map of such spaces, then the pullback functor agrees with the inverse image functor for -sheaves. In particular, when is a point and a space, then the constant -sheaf is identified with (the sheaf of sections of) the space over . Therefore, the nonabelian cohomology of with coefficients in is the same as the maps in from (the terminal object of ) to . Since the left adjoint of just forgets the structure map to , this is the same as maps in from to . Thereby we recover Lurie’s theorem, in the case when is a locally compact CW complex.