Quantization and Cohomology (Week 24)
Posted by John Baez
In this week’s seminar on Quantization and Cohomology, we drew a big chart comparing three approaches to connections and gauge transformations. The most sophisticated uses the idea of “smooth anafunctor” developed by Toby Bartels. A smooth anafunctor is something that looks locally, but perhaps not globally like a smooth functor!
-
Week 24 (May 15) - Connections and smooth anafunctors: review and prospectus.
Connections on the trivial principal -bundle over are smooth functors
; gauge transformations are smooth natural
transformations between these. Connections on a fixed principal G-bundle are smooth functors ; gauge transformations are smooth natural transformations
between these. Connections on an arbitrary, or variable principal
-bundle over are smooth anafunctors ;
gauge transformations are smooth ananatural transformations between
these. The definition of smooth anafunctor.
Supplementary reading:
-
Toby Bartels, Higher
gauge theory I: 2-bundles. Section 2.2.2, on "2-maps",
describes smooth anafunctors between smooth categories. Section 2.2.3
describes what I’m calling smooth ananatural transformations.
- Urs Schreiber and Konrad Waldorf, Parallel transport and functors. This develops some closely related ideas, including a more flexible notion of “-local -trivialization” for a functor, which generalizes the concept of smooth anafunctor in a useful way.
-
Toby Bartels, Higher
gauge theory I: 2-bundles. Section 2.2.2, on "2-maps",
describes smooth anafunctors between smooth categories. Section 2.2.3
describes what I’m calling smooth ananatural transformations.
Last week’s notes are here; next week’s notes are here.
Posted at June 1, 2007 6:14 PM UTC
Re: Quantization and Cohomology (Week 24)
Thanks for mentioning this!
The way I think about a -local -trivialization is as the bridge between the anafunctor (= “descent data” = “transition data” = “cocycle data”) and the global object defined by it.
Given one globally defined transport functor (where “transport” is supposed to mean: “admits some smooth local trivialization”) we may choose a fixed smooth local trivialization. From this choice we then obtain a descent datum, which is canonically equivalent to an anafunctor.
global functor descent data anafunctor.
So I am not sure if I would say that the notion of-local -trivialization generalizes that of anafunctor. Rather, I think of it as something connecting anafunctors with “global functors”.