Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

March 10, 2008

Exceptional F-Theory.

I’ve been reading Beasley, Heckman and Vafa’s recent 125 page opus, hoping to get through it before the promised Part II comes out.

F-theory is the fancy name for Type IIB string theory with 7-branes. If we compactify on B (for compactifications down to 4 dimensions, we’re interested in B a complex 3-fold), the 7-branes are wrapped on divisors in B. The complex IIB coupling, τ, has monodromies as we circle those divisors and, viewing it as the modulus of an elliptic curve, we get the total space of an elliptically-fibered Calabi-Yau 4-fold, XB.

Except for the case where one has only D7-branes (and orientifold O7 planes), Im(τ) cannot be taken to be uniformly large. So perturbative string theory techniques are not applicable. General configurations of 7-branes are hard to study, except in some special cases.

The interest, here, is to study a local model for a wrapped 7-brane, or perhaps a pair of 7-branes intersecting transversally, and study the local physics from the point of view of the twisted SYM theory living on the brane.

In the local model, B is noncompact, and is the total space of the line bundle

(1)B=Tot(N SBS)

where the normal bundle N SB=K S p, a power of the canonical bundle of the surface, S, on which the 7-brane is wrapped. Away from the zero section, we have an elliptic curve (with affine coordinates x,y) fibered over the base. Over the zero section, the curve degenerates, and the total space of XS looks like an isolated ADE surface singularity fibered over S. Denoting the fiber coordinate of BS as z, the total space of XS is given as the locus {f(x,y,z)=0}V, with

ADE 7-branes as the locus {f=0}Tot(VS)
f(x,y,z) V N SB K B ΔΓ(K B 12)
A n y 2x 2z n+1 K S (n+1)/2K S (n+1)/2K S K S 𝒪 ?
D n y 2x 2zz n1 K S n2K S n1K S 2 K S 2 π *(K S 1) ?
E 6 y 2x 3z 4 K S 4K S 6K S 3 K S 3 π *(K S 2) 2 43 3z 8
E 7 y 2x 3xz 3 K S 6K S 9K S 4 K S 4 π *(K S 3) 2 6z 9
E 8 y 2x 3z 5 K S 10K S 15K S 6 K S 6 π *(K S 5) 2 43 3z 10

Now, I’m a little confused by the A n and D n cases. As written, these are not elliptically-fibered; away from z=0, the fiber of XB looks to me like a smooth quadric. But the main focus of attention is on the exceptional cases where, indeed, we have a Weierstrass form for the equation of the elliptic fiber.

Now, the idea is that the local physics is captured by the 8D twisted SYM theory on R 3,1×S. The super Yang-Mills multiplet, in 8 dimensions, consists of a G S-connection, a complex scalar in the adjoint representation, and some fermions, also in the adjoint. After twisting, the scalar becomes a 2-form φΩ (2,0)(S,ad(P)),φ¯Ω (0,2)(S,ad(P)) where PS is a principal G S-bundle. The left-handed fermions are η α Γ(ad(P)) ψ α Ω (0,1)(S,ad(P)) χ α Ω (2,0)(S,ad(P)) and their right-handed conjugates are η¯ α˙ Γ(ad(P)) ψ¯ α˙ Ω (1,0)(S,ad(P)) χ¯ α˙ Ω (0,2)(S,ad(P)) The conditions for a supersymmetric solution are

(2)F S (2,0)=F S (0,2)=0 D S (1,0)φ¯=D S (0,1)φ=0 ωF S+i2[φ,φ¯]=0

Here, F S (2,0)=(D S (1,0)) 2,F S (0,2)=(D S (0,1)) 2,F S={D S (1,0),D S (0,1)} are, respectively, the (2,0), (0,2) and (1,1) parts of the field strength on S, and ω is the Kähler form.

In the particular case1 of φ=0 (or, more generally, [φ,φ¯]=0), (2), these equations imply the Donaldson-Uhlenbeck-Yau equation, whose solution is an anti-self-dual connection, with field strength F S, for some subgroup H SG S. Correspondingly, there’s a reduction of the structure group of P from G S to H S, Denoting by Γ S, the commutant of H S in G S, we decompose ad(P) i(R i𝒯 i) where R i are irreps of Γ i and 𝒯 i are vector bundles associated to our H S principal bundle.

One obtains massless 4D chiral multiplets, in representation R i from the Dolbeault cohomology groups

(3)(δφ,χ α)H 0(S,K S𝒯 i) (δa¯,ψ α)H 1(S,𝒯 i)

As a toy example, take S=𝔽 n, the nth Hirzebruch surface2, G S=E 6, H S=U(1) and the unbroken gauge group, Γ S=SO(10). That is, we have a nontrivial connection, satisfying the Donaldson-Uhlenbeck-Yau equation, for some line bundle S. Decomposing 78=45 0+1 0+16 3+16¯ 3 We get chiral multiplets in the 16 from H 1(S, 3), and 16¯s from H 1(S, 3). Their number is given by the index theorem. In the notation of the footnote, n 16 =(3b1)[(3b+1)32(2a+(2n)b)] n 16¯ =(3b+1)[(3b1)32(2a+(2n)b)]

The Yukawa couplings of the chiral multiplets (3) are obtained from the trilinear form c ijk:H 0(S,K S𝒯 i)H 1(S,𝒯 j)H 1(S,𝒯 i)

Unfortunately, for del Pezzo and Hirzebruch surfaces, H 0(S,K SE) vanishes, for any vector bundle, E, admitting a connection satisfying Donaldson-Uhlenbeck-Yau. So there are no nontrivial Yukawa couplings among these “bulk modes.”

Intersecting Branes

To get nontrivial Yukawa couplings, we need to consider intersecting branes. Let ΣS be a smooth, irreducible curve. We can modify our setup to include 7-branes wrapping R 3,1×S, where S=Tot(K S pΣ).

Since S is noncompact, the G S gauge theory on it is decoupled. But there are new degrees of freedom localized on Σ=SS, given essentially by 6 dimensional twisted gauge theory, for the group G ΣG S×G S. Let αH 0(S,𝒪 S(Σ)). As before, we want the fiber over a generic point in S to be an isolated ADE surface singularity, corresponding to G S. But, over S (roughly, taking z0, and allowing α to vary), we want a G S surface singularity.

Local model for intersecting ADE 7-branes
G S G S G Σ f(x,y,z) V L N SB K B
A n A m A n+m y 2x 2α m+1z n+1 LLK S 𝒪 S(m+12Σ)K S (n+1)/2 K S 𝒪
D n U(1) D n+1 y 2+x 2zα 2z n1 (LK S 1)LK S 2 𝒪 S(Σ)K S n1 K S 2 π *(K S 1)
E 6 A 2 E 8 y 2x 3α 2z 4 L 2L 3(LK S) 𝒪 S(Σ)K S 2 LK S π *(L 1)
E 7 A 1 E 8 y 2+x 316αxz 3 L 2L 3(LK S) 𝒪 S(Σ)K S 3 LK S π *(L 1)
E 8 E 8 y 2x 3αz 5 L 2L 3(LK S) 𝒪 S(Σ)K S 5 LK S π *(L 1)

Over Σ, there’s a G S×G S principal bundle, obtained by restricting the respective principal bundles over S and S. Decomposing ad(G Σ)=ad(G S)ad(G S)[ aU aU a] The twisted theory on 3,1×Σ has complex bosons, σ a, and left-handed fermions, λ aα, transforming as3 sections of K Σ 1/2𝒰 a𝒰 a, and their Hermitian conjugates. The equations for a supersymmetric background are D (0,1)σ=D (0,1)λ α=0 As before, we take the background gauge field on each 7-brane to be an anti-self dual connection for subgroups H SG S and H SG S. Under G S=Γ S×H S and G S=Γ S×H S, we decompose 𝒰 a = nR n𝒱 an 𝒰 a = nR n𝒱 an So we obtain 4D massless chiral multiplets, (σ,λ α)H 0(Σ,K Σ 1/2𝒱 an𝒱 an) in the representation (R n,R n) of Gamma S×Gamma S.

These have Yukawa couplings with the “bulk” fields discussed previously, given by the trilinear form

(4)H 0(Σ,K Σ 1/2𝒱 an𝒱 an)H 0(Σ,K Σ 1/2𝒱 bm𝒱 bm)H 1(Σ,𝒯 i Σ)

As a more refined version of the previous example, consider intersecting 7-branes, with G S=SO(12),H S=U(1),G S=SU(2),H S=U(1),G Σ=E 7 Under E 7SO(12)×SU(2), the adjoint decomposes as 133=(66,1)(1,3)(32,2) and decomposing further under SO(12)SO(10)×U(1) 66=45 0+1 0+10 2+10 2 32 =16 1+16¯ 1 So we have 4D chiral multiplets in representations of SO(10)

(5)10 H 1(Σ, 2)H 1(Σ, 2) 16 H 1(Σ,K Σ 1/2)H 1(Σ,K Σ 1/2() 1) 16¯ H 1(Σ,K Σ 1/2 1)H 1(Σ,K Σ 1/2 1() 1)

where the 10s are actually the restrictions to Σ of “bulk” modes on the 7-brane wrapped on S and , are appropriately-chosen line bundles. The Yukawa couplings are obtained by applying the trilinear form (4) to the modes in (5).

Yet more interesting structure arises when Σ is reducible, Σ= iΣ i, and one gets further contributions from the intersections, Σ iΣ j.


1 φ necessarily vanishes, when S is a Hirzebruch or del Pezzo surface, and H 0(S,K S n)=0,n>0.

2 A rational surface, 𝔽 n=Tot((𝒪(1)𝒪(n)) 1). H 2(𝔽 n) is generated by two classes, f,σ, with f 2=0,fσ=1,σ 2=n The Kähler class, ω=αf+βσ, must satisfy ω 2 >0 ωf >0 ωσ >0}{β >0 αnβ >0 A line bundle, 𝔽 n admits a connection satisfying the Donaldson-Uhlenbeck-Yau equation provided ωc 1()=0. Writing c 1()=af+bσ, ωc 1()=aα+b(αnβ) so, in particular, we require ab<0.

3 At first sight, this statement seems rather puzzling. While K Σ admits a square-root, if the genus is greater than zero, there is no canonical choice of square-root. In fact, Beasley et al argue that N ΣS=𝒪 S(Σ) Σ is isomorphic to K S Σ. Therefore, the adjunction formula, K Σ=K S ΣN ΣS implies a canonical choice of square-root, K Σ 1/2=K S Σ

Posted by distler at March 10, 2008 9:34 AM

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/1628

1 Comment & 0 Trackbacks

Re: Exceptional F-Theory.

Hi Jaques,

RE: In section 4.3 Unfolding singularites via surface operators:
Does this imply the possibility that symmetries may be folded rather than broken?

Posted by: Doug on April 13, 2008 8:14 AM | Permalink | Reply to this

Post a New Comment