Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

December 9, 2005

Exotic Instanton Effects

I’ve been reading the recent Beasley-Witten paper on instanton effects in string theory.

As you know, instantons can have dramatic effects on the vacuum structure of supersymmetric gauge theories. They can induce a superpotential that lifts degeneracies that are present to all orders in perturbation theory. More subtly, as found by Seiberg, in the case of SU(N c)SU(N_c) SQCD, with N f=N cN_f=N_c flavours, instanton effects can change the topology of the vacuum manifold. The singular affine variety,

(1)

det(M)BB˜=0 \det(M)- B\tilde B = 0 (where MM is an N c×N cN_c\times N_c complex matrix) is deformed to

(2)

det(M)BB˜=Λ 2N c \det(M)- B\tilde B = \Lambda^{2 N_c}

In their previous paper, Beasley and Witten argued that this effect can be understood as the generation of an exotic sort of “superpotential” of the form

(3)

W=ω ı¯ȷ¯(Φ,Φ¯)D α˙Φ ı¯D α˙Φ ȷ¯ W = \omega_{\overline{\imath}\overline{\jmath}}(\Phi,\overline{\Phi}) D_{\dot{\alpha}}\Phi^{\overline{\imath}}D^{\dot{\alpha}}\Phi^{\overline{\jmath}} where Φ ı¯\Phi^{\overline{\imath}} are anti-chiral superfields, parametrizing the moduli space, MM, and ω ı¯ȷ¯=12(g ı¯kωı¯ k+g ȷ¯kωı¯ k) \omega_{\overline{\imath}\overline{\jmath}} = \frac{1}{2} \left(g_{\overline{\imath}k} \tensor{\omega}{_\overline{\imath}_^k} + g_{\overline{\jmath}k} \tensor{\omega}{_\overline{\imath}_^k}\right) where g ı¯jg_{\overline{\imath}j} is the Kähler form on MM and ωı¯ jH 1(M,T M)\tensor{\omega}{_\overline{\imath}_^j}\in H^1(M, T_M) is the deformation of complex structure of MM that deforms (1) into (2)1.

In this particular case, this fancy formalism is somewhat superfluous. The constraint (2) can simply be imposed by introducing an additional chiral superfield, SS, and a garden-variety superpotential

(4)

W=S(det(M)BB˜Λ 2N c) W= S(\det(M)- B\tilde B - \Lambda^{2 N_c}) For Λ0\Lambda\neq0 (and, even for Λ=0\Lambda=0, away from the origin in field space), SS and some particular combination of the other fields are massive, and can be integrated out. When Λ=0\Lambda=0, all the fields are massless at the origin, and so integrating out SS leads to the singular Lagrangian, of the form (3), constructed in detail by Beasley and Witten for SU(2)SU(2).

In String Theory, alas, you can’t willy-nilly integrate-in fields. So there are situations where, presumably, you need to represent the instanton-induced deformation of the classical moduli space by an exotic superpotential of the form (3), instead of the more transparent (4).

Beasley and Witten lay out a couple of instances where they argue that’s the case, and show how you can calculate a superpotential of the form (3), induced by worldsheet instantons in heterotic string theory.

What’s quite interesting is that some of their heterotic computations are closely related to the higher-genus worldsheet instanton computations in the topological A-model. These compute what are, by now, quite well-known corrections to the N=2N=2 supergravity action that one obtains from a Type-IIA compactification on a Calabi-Yau. Beasley and Witten compute the analogous corrections to the N=1N=1 theory arising from a heterotic compactification on the same Calabi-Yau (they’re F-terms involving higher powers of the supersymmetric gauge field strength squared, W αW αW_\alpha W^\alpha).


1 We’re identifying a finite deformation of the complex structure with an infinitesimal tangent vector (an element of H 1(M,T M)H^1(M, T_M)) to the space of deformations, at the point corresponding to the complex structure of the classical moduli space, M 0M_0 (which, typically, but not in the example above, is a singular point in the space of complex structures). Moreover, to write this “F-term”, we need to use the Kähler metric on M 0M_0, which is singular. It’s not obvious that this makes sense. However, when you can integrate-in some fields and write the deformation as an ordinary superpotential (as above), you can check this procedure reproduces the correct result.

Posted by distler at December 9, 2005 11:43 PM

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/694

3 Comments & 0 Trackbacks

Higher dimensions of fiction?

Hi there. Recently, I’ve been searching for a credible physicist or scholar to take a look at my novel “The Pink Room,” which was published last month. Briefly, the world’s leading physicist attempts to use the science of string theory to bring his daughter back from the dead. Government agents and a bestselling novelist race to find out if he was succesful.

Posted by: Mark LaFlamme on January 27, 2006 7:53 PM | Permalink | Reply to this

Re: Higher dimensions of fiction?

Ultimately, your novel must be judged on its literary merits, not on whether — by luck, or by dint of great effort — you happened to get the science “right.”

While my aunt was a writer of some repute, I don’t think I would be the best judge of the literary merits of your novel.

But, since you’ve left comments on several Physics blogs about your novel, I’m sure that someone, somewhere, will provide you with the feedback you desire.

[A less charitable explanation is that you are spamming every Physics (or other) blog that you can find, and couldn’t care less about getting feedback about your novel.]

Posted by: Jacques Distler on January 27, 2006 9:21 PM | Permalink | PGP Sig | Reply to this

Re: Exotic Instanton Effects

Whoa, whoa! Perish that thought. I don’t spam. I’ve been getting great feedback from the people who enjoy a good thriller. The literary merits of the novel appear to be sound. Now, I’m just trying to satisfy my curiosity about the scientific accuracy of the story. You’re right, of course. It doesn’t need to be textbook solid. As I’ve said, it’s a curiosity. And I thought offering up a free copy might be the way to go about it.

Posted by: Mark LaFlamme on January 29, 2006 12:41 AM | Permalink | Reply to this

Post a New Comment