Musings

Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

« Hold Onto Your Wallet | Main | What Will They Think of Next? »

January 30, 2004

Not in Kansas

There’s a lively discussion over at the String Coffee Table of a recent paper by Thomas Thiemann on a new, LQG-inspired quantization of the Nambu-Goto string. The paper is either incredibly clever, or incredibly naïve.

Posted by distler at January 30, 2004 1:16 AM

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/303

Some Related Entries

Search for other entries:

4 Comments & 0 Trackbacks

PGP-Signed Comment Test

Let’s try

(1)$${\int }_{-\mathrm{\infty }}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{e}^{-x^2}\mathrm{dx}=\sqrt{\pi }$$

how was that for you?

Posted by: Jacques Distler on February 28, 2004 1:04 PM | Permalink | PGP Sig | Reply to this

Re: PGP-Signed Comment Test

Ooooooh, that was a good signature for me. How was it for you?

Posted by: Phil Ringnalda on February 28, 2004 1:47 PM | Permalink | PGP Sig | Reply to this

Re: PGP-Signed Comment Test

Tedious, I’m afraid.

There are still quite a few bugs in the plugin.

Posted by: Jacques Distler on February 28, 2004 2:23 PM | Permalink | PGP Sig | Reply to this

Re: PGP-Signed Comment Test

Deliberately bad signature.

This one won’t verify.

Posted by: Jacques Distler on February 29, 2004 10:33 PM | Permalink | PGP Sig | Reply to this

Post a New Comment