Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

February 3, 2006

Seminar on 2-Vector Bundles and Elliptic Cohomology, II

Posted by urs

Here is a transcript of part 1 of our first session.

(1) Bipermutative Categories.

Definition. A symmetric bimonoidal category is a category with two bifunctors

(1),:×

as well as two special objects 1 and 0

- such that 1 is the unit with respect to and 0 that with respct to

- such that , are associative, commutative and unital up to coherent natural isomorphism and

- such that distributes over up to coherent natural isomorphism.


Definition. A symmetric bimonoidal category is called a bipermutative category if all structure isomorphisms are identities, except for

(2)AB c BA AB c BA

and

(3)A(BC)(AB)(AC).

These are required to make

(4)A(BC) (AB)(AC) c c c (BC)A (BA)(CA)

commute.


Example. Let V be the skeleton of the category of finite dimensional vector spaces over the complex numbers, with all morphisms being isomorphisms.

This means that

(5)Obj(V)=
(6)Mor V(n,m)={U(n) forn=m fornm

and we simply have

(7)nm = n+m nm = nm

and U(n)U(m) is the block sum of matrices and U(n)U(m) the tensor product.

V is clearly bipermutative.


Remark. As long as one can pick a “reasonable” skeleton, a similar construction will work for other abelian monoidal categories.


Definition. Let C be an arbitrary small category. The set π 0 C of path components of C is the set of equivalence classes of objects of C under the equivalence relation

(8)cπ 0 dMor C(c,d)orMor C(d,c).


Remark.

1) Denote by BC the classifying space (geometric realization of the nerve of) C and by π 0 BC is 0th homotopy group, then

(9)π 0 C=π 0 BC.

2) If is a small bipermutative category, then π 0 is a commutative semiring. In this case we have

(10)[b] π 0 [b] π 0 = [bb] π 0 [b] π 0 +[b] π 0 = [bb] π 0 .


Example. For =V we have π 0 V=, with regarded as a commutative semiring.


Definition. Let be a small bipermutative category. Then M n() denotes the category of n×n matrices over . Here

(11)Obj(M n()) = {(b ij) i,j=1 n b ijObj()} Mor(M n()) = {(b ijϕ ijb ij) i,j=1 n ϕ ijMor()}.

We have a matrix multiplication functor

(12)M n()×M n() M n() (b ij)×(c ij) ( k=1 nb ikc kj).


Side remark. We are secretly talking in a simplified way about the 2-category of Kapranov-Voevodsky’s 2-vector spaces, without wanting to make the 2-business explicit.


Proposition. Let I n be the obvious unit matrix object in M n(). Then

(13)(M n()),,I n)

is a tensor category. (“” is the above matrix multiplication functor.)


Definition. For bipermutative, denote by A the group completion of the semiring π 0 .

This is simply obtained by throwing in formal additive inverses to all elements in π 0 . There is a natural injection

(14)π 0 A .


Example. Obviously we have A V=.

Now comes the crucial definition of part 1). We define a generalized notion of invertible objects in M n().


Definition.

1) Let be a small bipermutative category. Denote by GL n(A ) the ordinary general linear group over A . Denote by GL n(π 0 ) the set defined by this pullback:

(15)GL n(π 0 ) GL n(A ) M n(π 0 ) M n(A ).

2) Define GL n() as the full subcategory of M n() whose objects (b ij) are such that

(16)([b ij] π 0 )GL n(π 0 ).

In words, GL n() is the subcategory of those matrices of vector spaces which would be invertible had we somehow allowed “virtual vector spaces”. i.e. formal inverses for .


Example. For =V we have

(17)GL n(π 0 V)=GL n().

This are all matrices AM n() which are invertible over , i.e. those with det(A)=±1 .


Remark. (GL n(),,I n) inherits a tensor structure from M n().

next:

2) Algebraic K-theory of Bipermutative Categories

3) K(V) and Elliptic Cohomology

Posted at February 3, 2006 4:15 PM UTC

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/738

2 Comments & 5 Trackbacks

Read the post And the winner is...
Weblog: SciGuy
Excerpt: Erica, who submitted GruntDoc in the first iteration of Battle of the Books. This is a thoughtful, well-written blog by a Texas emergency physician that I will return to. The most recent entry is a pretty depressing view of emergency...
Tracked: February 3, 2006 7:37 PM

2-topologies

Hi Urs

Sorry to butt in on your wonderful exposition of interesting things, but, did that thesis on 2-topologies (that was supposed to be out at the end of ‘05) ever materialise?

Posted by: Kea on February 4, 2006 1:06 AM | Permalink | Reply to this

Re: 2-topologies

did that thesis on 2-topologies (that was supposed to be out at the end of ‘05) ever materialise?

You mean the thesis by Igor Bakovic? Not yet. It is still in the making. I plan to report on this when possible. Igor plans to visit Hamburg in the near future.

Posted by: urs on February 4, 2006 5:37 PM | Permalink | Reply to this
Read the post Seminar on 2-Vector Bundles and Elliptic Cohomology, I
Weblog: The String Coffee Table
Excerpt: Review of the 2-vector approach towards elliptic cohomology. Part I.
Tracked: August 7, 2006 1:12 PM
Read the post Seminar on 2-Vector Bundles and Elliptic Cohomology, V
Weblog: The String Coffee Table
Excerpt: Part V of a seminar on elliptic cohomology and 2-vector bundles. Review of relations between elliptic cohomology and strings.
Tracked: May 9, 2007 10:45 PM
Read the post Extended Quantum Field Theory and Cohomology, I
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: On understanding extended quantum field theory and generalized cohomology.
Tracked: June 8, 2007 2:22 PM
Read the post Extended Quantum Field Theory and Cohomology, I
Weblog: The n-Category Café
Excerpt: On understanding extended quantum field theory and generalized cohomology.
Tracked: June 8, 2007 2:23 PM

Post a New Comment