Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

October 9, 2006

On n-Transport: Descent of the Universal Transition

Posted by Urs Schreiber

Last time # I talked about how the category of n-paths (I consider n=1 and n=2 only) in a space X and that of n-paths in a regular surjection

(1)p:P n(Y)P n(X)

give rise to the universal local transition P n(Y ) of n-transport # on X; and that this is nothing but the category of n-paths in Y which may “jump” between different lifts along p.

Moreover, from any p-local transition data of n-transport (trivial transport on single patches, transitions g of that on double intersections, transitions f of these on triple intersections, and so on) one obtains a 2-transport

(2)(tra Y,g,f):P 2 (Y )T.

Clearly, this wants to descend to X. The descent is manifest if

(3)P 2 (Y )P 2 (X).

For general Y the constructions of this equivalence that I have managed to come up with (e.g. section 3. here) are a little unwieldy. But with a certain assumption on Y (which in common applications is always possible) it looks much better:

descent of the universal transition.

Posted at October 9, 2006 6:56 PM UTC

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/974

0 Comments & 0 Trackbacks

Post a New Comment