Streetfest Workshop 3
Posted by Guest
Let’s start with Katzarkov’s talk on ‘Mirror symmetry and manifolds of general type’. He began with a question: are there instances of distinct (not symplectomorphic) 4D symplectic simply connected mannifolds and such that their Gromov-Witten invariants are equal? It turns out there is. Katzarkov mentioned an example of Donaldson’s, but more generally there is a conjecture that the image of Ch in is the sublattice of of vanishing cocycles.
So what is all the terminology here? is always a symplectic manifold. is a perverse sheaf of vanishing cycles for the mirror . For an the categorical equivalence is between the so-called Fukaya category for and the bounded sheaves as discussed in the first talk in Sydney.
Other workshop talks…..
After Katzarkov, Getzler dazzled us all once again with open and closed modular operads. Let be a symmetric monoidal category and a sequence of objects labelled by a genus and the number of legs at a vertex. The overall genus of a graph is given by the sum of the vertex genuses plus the first Betti number of the graph. Thus a graph with non-negative integers assigned to each vertex yields composition rules, such as where is the genus of a graph that the reader may easily identify.
Example: P(g,n) = the moduli space of conformal structures for a Riemann surface of genus with punctures. This motivates throwing away graphs and using ‘thicked lines’ or rather surfaces. String theory! The nice category here has oriented surfaces as objects. Morphisms are pairs of surfaces together with a configuration of curves in the target and an isomorphism between the source and the surface obtained from the target by cutting along the curves.
By definition, a modular operad is a symmetric monoidal functor from this category to .
A slightly different version gives a characterisation of open conformal field theory. We can talk about the Deligne-Mumford compactification of where as before is the number of boundary components that are circles and is the number of boundary components that are arcs etc. This moduli space of compact orbifolds with corners has dimension . Considering, for example, the case one obtains the associahedron rule!
Finally, Getzler mentioned the theorem that states that the 2-skeleton of each component of this moduli space is connected.
Now I must go and listen to Higson, Getzler and others talk about NCG. Marni