Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

July 17, 2005

Costello on Open Topological Strings

Posted by urs

A while ago I had mentioned some literature on the Segal-like description of open topological strings. Here is a comment on that from Kevin Costello, which I believe I may reproduce here:

Kevin Costello wrote:

Hi Urs

I’ve been looking at your blog, and came across some comments you made a few months back about open topological strings. I just thought I’d point out a paper I wrote about this stuff, math.QA/0412149, in case you’re interested.

There’s a Segal style definition of closed topological string theory, as follows. There’s a category, whose objects are the integers, and whose morphisms are the singular chains on the moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces with n incoming and m outgoing boundaries. A functor from this to chain complexes, which is compatible with differentials, should be a closed topological string theory.

This is the type of structure that arises in for example Gromov-Witten theory.

Segal calls such a gadget a ‘string background’. Some people (including me) use the phrase ‘topological conformal field theory’ (TCFT) but possibly this is a misnomer.

This is a much richer structure than simply a Frobenius algebra, because of the complexity of the topology of the moduli spaces of curves. We find a Frobenius algebra when we take H 0 .

Anyway, there’s a straightforward way to modify this definition for open strings and open-closed strings.

What I show in my paper is that if we do the open analog of this, then an open TCFT is the same as an A category satisfying a Calabi-Yau condition. This is a kind of categorification of the ribbon graph picture of moduli space.

I also show how to construct the closed theory from the open, and that when we do this to the Fukaya category we should recover Gromov-Witten theory. Applying this to an A version of derived category of sheaves on a Calabi-Yau gives the B model.

Cheers – and sorry for the long mail Kevin Costello

I’ll have a look at that as soon as possible. Right now I am preparing for a vacation.

Posted at July 17, 2005 4:47 PM UTC

TrackBack URL for this Entry:

0 Comments & 2 Trackbacks

Read the post Lauda & Pfeiffer on Open-Closed Topological Strings
Weblog: The String Coffee Table
Excerpt: Lauda and Pfeiffer fill some gaps in the rigorous understanding of open topological strings.
Tracked: December 2, 2005 12:26 PM
Read the post TCFT, Part I
Weblog: The String Coffee Table
Excerpt: Some basic ideas of TCFT.
Tracked: January 10, 2006 4:28 PM

Post a New Comment