Thursday at the Streetfest II
Posted by Guest
David here
I thought I’d talk a bit about Ezra Getzler’s talk (which was only loosely connected to his abstract) on some Lie theory for algebras. He started off by saying that is is just as worthwhile working with the nerve of a groupoid and so we defined something to work with:
Given a simplicial set , we can consider the horn of the -simplex . If the maps are surjective and for bijective, then is the nerve of an -groupoid. We are far more interested in Lie -groupoids and so need to be a simplicial manifold and the various maps to be surjective submersions. This agrees with the usual defintion of Lie groupoid when and we call this beast a Li -group if (i.e. has space of objects a point).
I believe algebras have been discussed before on this blog (see here for links to various papers), but I’ll give a lightning definition:
An algebra is a -graded vector space with -brackets (functions on -fold tensor product) satisfying a generalised Jacobi property, which encodes the Leibniz rule for , makes the 1-bracket a differential, among others. If the -brackets are all zero for then we are only talking about a dg-Lie algebra.
We then found out that if the graded vector space is concentrated in degrees -1 and 0, i.e. then is a Lie algebra. More generally a Lie n-algebra is an algebra concentratd in degrees .
He then went to define differential forms on an -simplex such that the complex of such things is a simplicial dg-algebra. After some nested defintions, we got to the Maurer-Cartan simplicial set of which is the same as the nerve of a dg-Lie algebra.
The next talk is starting. More…
D
PS - Fri 1.42PM local - Many apologies for not getting this one up, or even finishing it off - I just couldn’t get the XHTML to work -actually it was a LaTeX problem :(. I’ll just give some references. Sorry Urs - this was one you would have liked.
Hinich, V and Schechtman, V, Homotopy Lie algebras
Hinich, V, DG coalgebras as formal stacks
There was also reference to the work of J. Duskin and T. Beke, but a search just now on MathSciNet didn’t turn up anything I could conceptually link to the talk.
Must dash
David