Nonabelian gerbes with connection and curving from 2-bundles with 2-holonomy
Posted by Urs Schreiber
Theorem: A -2-bundle with (‘categorically discrete’) base 2-space, strict structure automorphism 2-group, connection and 2-holonomy defines a nonabelian gerbe with connection and inner curving .
Proof:
The following sketch of a proof heavily uses definitions and results from math.CT/0410328, hep-th/0409200 and hep-th/0309173. But a -2-bundle with connection has not been defined yet, so here is the definition:
Definition: A G-2-bundle with connection is a 2-bundle with 2-cover together with a 2-map
(where is the tangent 2-space to U) and with a natural transformation between the 2-map given by and that given by on double overlaps.:
(This is just the categorification of the transition law for a connection 1-form in an ordinary bundle.)
Now one can check the following:
(Let be the strict automorphism 2-group and be the transition 2-map.)
1) A 2-transition on the 2-bundle is a natural transformation that encodes functions satisfying
on triple overlaps.
2) The coherence law for this natural transformation says that
on quadruple overlaps.
3) The natural transformation encodes functions satisfying
on double overlaps.
4) The coherence law associated with gives a further relation between , , and .
5) The existence of a 2-holonomy in the 2-bundle implies locally the existence of 2-forms satisfying
where is the curvature of .
6) From 3) it follows that the transition law for is
where
7) From the fact that the 2-holonomy is globally defined (by assumption) it hence follows that the local are related by
on double overlaps.
The above list of equations characterizing properties of the 2-bundle with connection and holonomy can be checked to be the defining equations of a nonabelian gerbe with connection and curving characterized by the generalized cocycle
for the special case
, , .
Remark:
There are lots of of points where the above can be generalized: For one, it is possible to show how by allowing base 2-spaces whose arrow space is that of based loops one can get twisted nonabelian gerbes.
Then there is a strange dichotomy between generalizations possible on the 2-bundle side and those possible on the gerbe side: At the beginning of the above proof I severely restricted the possible properties of 2-bundles (e.g. they don’t need to have automorphism groups as structure 2-groups, as opposed to gerbes, and in fact they can have weak structure 2-groups), while at the end I restricted those of the nonabelian gerbe (by specializing to a very specific class of curving data).
But the latter restriction comes from the assumption that a 2-holonomy exists, as I have discussed a couple of times before here. It would be very interesting to better understand how this can be relaxed, if at all.
Posted at November 3, 2004 2:37 PM UTC