Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

November 3, 2004

Nonabelian gerbes with connection and curving from 2-bundles with 2-holonomy

Posted by Urs Schreiber

Theorem: A GG-2-bundle with (‘categorically discrete’) base 2-space, strict structure automorphism 2-group, connection and 2-holonomy defines a nonabelian gerbe with connection and inner curving .

Proof:

The following sketch of a proof heavily uses definitions and results from math.CT/0410328, hep-th/0409200 and hep-th/0309173. But a GG-2-bundle with connection has not been defined yet, so here is the definition:

Definition: A G-2-bundle with connection is a 2-bundle with 2-cover UU together with a 2-map

(1)A:TULie(G) A : TU \longrightarrow {Lie}(G)

(where TUTU is the tangent 2-space to U) and with a natural transformation κ\kappa between the 2-map given by A iA_i and that given by g ijA jg ij 1g_{ij}A_j g_{ij}^{-1} on double overlaps.:

(2)κ:A ig ij(d+A j)g ij 1. \kappa: A_i \to g_{ij} (d+A_j) g_{ij}^{-1} \,.

(This is just the categorification of the transition law for a connection 1-form in an ordinary bundle.)

Now one can check the following:

(Let G=(H,Aut(H),t=Ad)G = (H,{Aut}(H),t={Ad}) be the strict automorphism 2-group and gg be the transition 2-map.)

1) A 2-transition on the 2-bundle is a natural transformation that encodes functions f ijkΩ 0Lie(H)f_{ijk} \in \Omega^0 \otimes {Lie}(H) satisfying

(3)g ijg jk=Ad f ijkg ik g_{ij}g_{jk} = {Ad}_{f_ijk}\, g_{ik}

on triple overlaps.

2) The coherence law for this natural transformation says that

(4)f ikl 1f ijk 1g ij(f jkl)f ijl=1 f_{ikl}^{-1}f_{ijk}^{-1} g_{ij}(f_{jkl})f_{ijl} = 1

on quadruple overlaps.

3) The natural transformation κ\kappa encodes functions a ijΩ 1Lie(H)a_{ij} \in \Omega^1 \otimes {Lie}(H) satisfying

(5)A i+ad(a ij)=g ij(d+A j)g ij 1 A_i + {ad}(a_{ij}) = g_{ij}(d + A_j)g_{ij}^{-1}

on double overlaps.

4) The coherence law associated with κ\kappa gives a further relation between g ijg_{ij}, A iA_i, a ija_{ij} and f ijkf_{ijk}.

5) The existence of a 2-holonomy in the 2-bundle implies locally the existence of 2-forms B iΩ 2Lie(H)B_i \in \Omega^2 \otimes {Lie}(H) satisfying

(6)K i+ad(B i)=0, K_i + {ad}(B_i) = 0 \,,

where K iK_i is the curvature of A iA_i.

6) From 3) it follows that the transition law for K iK_i is

(7)K i+ad(k ij)=g ij(d+A j)g ij 1, K_i + {ad}(k_{ij}) = g_{ij}(d + A_j)g_{ij}^{-1} \,,

where

(8)k ij=da ij+a ija ij+A i(a ij). k_{ij} = d a_{ij} + a_{ij}\wedge a_{ij} + A_i(a_{ij}) \,.

7) From the fact that the 2-holonomy is globally defined (by assumption) it hence follows that the local B iB_i are related by

(9)B i=g ij(B j)+k ij B_i = g_{ij}(B_j) + k_{ij}

on double overlaps.

The above list of equations characterizing properties of the 2-bundle with connection and holonomy can be checked to be the defining equations of a nonabelian gerbe with connection and curving characterized by the generalized cocycle

(10)(f ijk,g ij,a ij,A i,B i,d ij,H i) (f_{ijk},g_{ij},a_{ij},A_i,B_i,d_{ij},H_i)

for the special case

ad(B i)=K i {ad}(B_i) = -K_i , d ij=0 d_{ij} = 0 , ad(H i)=0 {ad}(H_i) = 0 .

Remark:

There are lots of of points where the above can be generalized: For one, it is possible to show how by allowing base 2-spaces whose arrow space is that of based loops one can get twisted nonabelian gerbes.

Then there is a strange dichotomy between generalizations possible on the 2-bundle side and those possible on the gerbe side: At the beginning of the above proof I severely restricted the possible properties of 2-bundles (e.g. they don’t need to have automorphism groups as structure 2-groups, as opposed to gerbes, and in fact they can have weak structure 2-groups), while at the end I restricted those of the nonabelian gerbe (by specializing to a very specific class of curving data).

But the latter restriction comes from the assumption that a 2-holonomy exists, as I have discussed a couple of times before here. It would be very interesting to better understand how this can be relaxed, if at all.

Posted at November 3, 2004 2:37 PM UTC

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   https://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/465

0 Comments & 1 Trackback

Read the post The Standard Model
Weblog: Your Guess Is As Good As Mine
Excerpt: When you tire of String Theory, refer back to The Standard Model Later... Alternatively, and I mean it when I say that, you could sit around the String Coffee Table and discuss Nonabelian gerbes with connection and curving from...
Tracked: December 12, 2004 8:12 PM