Recent Posts by jl345
posted 12 years ago
jl345
6 posts
|
I tried a little test case… $ cat subtest.rb #!/usr/bin/env ruby puts '/some/other/string'.gsub( '/some/other' + File::SEPARATOR, '' ) puts '/some/other/string'.gsub( Regexp.escape( '/some/other' + File::SEPARATOR), '' ) puts '/some/other/string'.gsub( Regexp.new( Regexp.escape( '/some/other' + File::SEPARATOR ) ), '' ) $ ./subtest.rb string string string $ ruby --version ruby 1.8.7 (2012-06-29 patchlevel 370) [x86_64-openbsd] I believe that my first and third examples are both correct and equivalent, going by official docs. The second example works, too, in this case, because a forward slash is apparently not one of the characters escaped by |
posted 12 years ago
jl345
6 posts
edited 12 years ago |
--- instiki-0.19.4/lib/tasks/fixtures.rake.orig Sat Jun 30 19:40:02 2012 +++ instiki-0.19.4/lib/tasks/fixtures.rake Wed Jul 18 01:33:06 2012 @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ task :import_all => :environment do ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection Dir.glob(Rails.root.join('dump','fixtures',"*.yml")).each do |f| - table_name = f.gsub( Regexp.escape(Rails.root.join('dump','fixtures').to_s + File::SEPARATOR), '').gsub('.yml', '') + table_name = f.gsub( Rails.root.join('dump','fixtures').to_s + File::Separator, '').gsub('.yml', '') puts "Importing #{table_name}" import_table_fixture(table_name) end That’s what I have anyways, but be careful, because somehow I got |
posted 12 years ago
jl345
6 posts
|
Ahh! I figured out what went wrong with my PostgresQL import. The tables were just fine in fact; just the last sequence numbers for all the primary keys had all gotten set to one for some reason. It worked fine once I got the sequence numbers adjusted to the last row in each table, so now my installation of Instiki appears to be working great on PostgreSQL. Again, Instiki is an awesome wiki, and I’m already using it to take math notes and such for stuff I have to learn. |
posted 12 years ago
jl345
6 posts
|
Hi! I was experimenting around, trying to migrate this wiki to PostgreSQL 9.1.4, following your instructions, and I think there was a little bug in
Now my database has all the tables in it, populated with rows, and I can view the pages, but when I try to edit a page, there is an error, because it looks like the primary keys were not set up properly on these tables, so I’m still trying to figure this out. Any ideas? (I think I need to make sure there is utf8 support, too…) Thanks! |
posted 12 years ago
jl345
6 posts
edited 12 years ago |
Forum: itex2MML – Topic: weird math fonts I didn’t mean to do that, but you like to make the forum better and better, so all’s well that ends well, I hope… With the STIX fonts, those letters do all look the same, in the curlier script. *** However, I think part of the problem is that the calligraphic BEFHIKLM live in a totally different area of Unicode than the other calligraphic letters. Your ”ℬ” at U+212C certainly doesn’t immediately follow the ”𝒜” at U+1D49C. The very next symbol after ”𝒜” is ”” (undefined), followed by ”𝒞” and ”𝒟”, because the Unicrats who designed these things in their infinite wisdom ensured that only a portion of the “calligraphic” alphabet was put in a different codepage on an alternate plane of existence, where some fonts may or may not even have glyphs, and the glyph may very well look different, because there is absolutely no assurance in Unicode of any consistency in the way fonts are going to be applied across such vastly different planes of the code space. Why isn’t it possible to put real ASCII letters in a calligraphic font? Seems like it should work but it doesn’t, in my browser anyways:
|
posted 12 years ago
jl345
6 posts
edited 12 years ago |
Forum: itex2MML – Topic: weird math fonts Maybe it’s just general persnicketiness on my part, but why do appear (in Firefox and rekonq) in a different type than the letters ? And how can I get a letter like or to stand upright like but by itself without getting italicized? (Sorry for the new username. I lost my password and for some reason Yahoo can’t get mail from the forums.) |