Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

March 6, 2005

Small Blackholes

I recently wrote about Greg Moore and collaborators’ work computing the entropy of a certain class of N=2N=2 blackholes which arise in the compactification of Type IIA on a Calabi-Yau.

Alex Maloney visited us this past week, and gave us a beautiful talk on his work on the geometry of the blackholes in question. The situation is really quite striking. Classically, these blackholes have vanishing horizon area. They have a null singularity, a pathology which, says Alex, is characterized as “naked with the lights off” in the GR literature.

Umh, whatever

One-loop corrections in the string theory induce certain curvature-squared corrections, which can be written as integrals over half of N=2N=2 superspace (a holomorphic function of the Kähler moduli times square of the self-dual part of the Weyl curvature, plus Hermitian conjugate).

These corrections have a dramatic effect. They make the singularity time-like and cloak it behind a horizon. In the corrected geometry, one recovers a formula in which the blackhole entropy is proportional to the area. But, instead of the Bekenstein-Hawking formula, S=14AS=\frac{1}{4} A, you find S=12AS=\frac{1}{2} A!

Now, at first you might be suspicious: if the one-loop corrections radically change the answer, how about two-loops …? But that’s the wrong way to think about it. For these blackholes, the tree-level answers (for the area and entropy) happen to *vanish*. The one-loop answer is the *leading* nonvanishing contribution. Higher corrections are still controllably small compared to the leading term.

In a little more detail, consider the (tree plus) one-loop Topological String free energy, which I called F pertF_{\text{pert}} in the previous post,

(1)F(X A,T 2)=16D abcX aX bX cX 0+12A abX aX b+124c 2aX aX 0T 264 F(X^A,T^2) = \frac{1}{6} D_{a b c} \frac{X^a X^b X^c}{X^0} +\frac{1}{2} A_{a b}X^a X^b +\frac{1}{24} c_{2 a} \frac{X^a}{X^0} \frac{T^2}{64}

The (generalized) attractor equations are

(2)C 2T 2=256,Re(CX A)=p A,Re(CF A)=q A C^2 T^2 = 256,\quad Re(C X^A) = p^A,\quad Re(C F_A)=q_A

Let’s solve them in this one-loop approximation, assuming the electric graviphoton charge, p 0=0p^0=0. The computation is fairly easy;

(3)CX 0 =iD+c 2ap a6q^ 0 CX a =p a+iD+c 2dp d6q^ 0D ab(q bA bcp c) \array{ \arrayopts{\colalign{right left}} C X^0 &= i \sqrt{\frac{D+c_{2 a}p^a}{6\hat{q}_0}} \\ C X^a &= p^a + i \sqrt{\frac{D+c_{2 d}p^d}{6\hat{q}_0}} D^{a b} (q_b - A_{b c} p^c) }

where

(4)q^ 0 =q 0+12D ab(q aA acp c)(q bA bdp d) D ab =D abcp c,D abD bc=δ c a,D=D abcp ap bp c \array{ \arrayopts{\colalign{right left}} \hat{q}_0 &= q_0 +\frac{1}{2} D^{a b} (q_a - A_{a c} p^c) (q_b - A_{b d} p^d) \\ D_{a b} &= D_{a b c} p^c,\quad D^{a b}D_{b c}= \delta^a_c,\quad D=D_{a b c} p^a p^b p^c }

Plugging into the formula for the horizon area,

(5)A =πi|C| 2(X AF¯ AX¯ AF A) =2πq^ 06(D+c 2ap a)(D+12c 2ap a) \array{ \arrayopts{\colalign{right left}} A &= \pi i |C|^2 (X^A \overline{F}_A - \overline{X}^A F_A) \\ &=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{\hat{q}_0}{6(D+c_{2 a}p^a)}} (D+\frac{1}{2} c_{2 a}p^a) }

and the (Wald-corrected) formula for the entropy,

(6)S =14A+128πi(F¯T¯ 2FT 2) =π2q^ 0(D+c 2ap a)/6 \array{ \arrayopts{\colalign{right left}} S &= \frac{1}{4} A + 128\pi i \left(\frac{\partial \overline{F}}{\partial \overline{T}^2} - \frac{\partial F}{\partial T^2} \right) \\ &= \frac{\pi}{2} \sqrt{\hat{q}_0 (D +c_{2 a}p^a)/6} }

Now, in “conventional” four-(or more)-charged blackholes, such that D=D abcp ap bp cD=D_{a b c}p^a p^b p^c and q^ 0\hat{q}_0 are both large, this just gives

(7)A=2πq^ 0D/6 A = 2\pi \sqrt{\hat{q}_0 D/6}

and

(8)S=14A(1+12c 2ap a/D) S = \frac{1}{4} A\, \left(1 +\frac{1}{2} c_{2 a} p^a/D\right)

the Bekenstein-Hawking result plus a small one-loop correction. However, for these two-charged blackholes, D=0D=0, and we get

(9)A=πq^ 0c 2ap a/6 A = \pi\sqrt{\hat{q}_0 c_{2 a} p^a/6}

and S=12AS=\frac{1}{2} A.

It’s really quite nice that we are seeing essentially stringy effects rescuing cosmic censorship, while generating substantial corrections to the Bekenstein-Hawking formula.

Posted by distler at March 6, 2005 12:43 AM

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/522

0 Comments & 0 Trackbacks

Post a New Comment