Skip to the Main Content

Note:These pages make extensive use of the latest XHTML and CSS Standards. They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.x and IE 4.x. Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion (and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards) is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser. If that's not possible, consider moving to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser.

October 1, 2004

BPS Droplets

A while ago, David Berenstein suggested a matrix model description of the 1/2-BPS sector of N=4 SYM. The idea is to pick a U(1)SU(4) RU(1)\subset SU(4)_R, generated by JJ and the Hamiltonian

(1)limϵ0H ϵ=ΔJ+ϵΔϵ \underset{\epsilon\to 0}{\lim} H_\epsilon = \frac{\Delta-J + \epsilon \Delta}{\epsilon}

When reduced on ×S 3\mathbb{R}\times S^3, this theory is equivalent to a gauged large-NN matrix model with a harmonic oscillator potential. The dynamics of the eigenvalues of the matrix model reduces to a theory of NN free fermions in a harmonic oscillator potential.

The ground state of AdS5×S5 is the filled Fermi sea, a circular disk in phase space. Ripples on the Fermi surface correspond to 1/2-BPS supergravity excitations (JNJ\ll N). Isolated droplets above or holes below the Fermi surface correspond to giant gravitons (JNJ\sim N).

Lin, Lunin and Maldacena have a very beautiful recent paper, in which they extend this picture to arbitrary droplets (JN 2J\sim N^2). They provide a detailed map between states of the Fermi theory and IIB supergravity geometries with SO(4)×SO(4)×SO(4)\times SO(4)\times \mathbb{R} isometry and 16 supercharges. The supergravity solutions are specified by a function z(x 1,x 2,y)z(x_1,x_2,y), obeying

(2) i 2z+y y( yzy)=0 \partial_i^2 z + y\partial_y\left( \textstyle{\frac{\partial_y z}{y}}\right)=0

The corresponding supergravity solution is nonsingular, provided z(x 1,x 2,0)=±1/2z(x_1,x_2,0)=\pm 1/2. So we need to specify, as a boundary condition at y=0y=0, those regions in the x 1x_1-x 2x_2 plane where z=+1/2z=+1/2 and those where z=1/2z=-1/2. Equivalently, we specify the boundary between these two regions — a shape for the Fermi surface.

The topology of the Fermi surface determines the topology of the supergravity solution; the detailed geometry of the Fermi surface determines the geometry of the supergravity solution.

LL&M extend this prescription to compactifications of M-theory on AdS4×S7 and AdS7×S4. Really nice stuff.

Posted by distler at October 1, 2004 10:54 AM

TrackBack URL for this Entry:   http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/cgi-bin/MT-3.0/dxy-tb.fcgi/441

0 Comments & 0 Trackbacks

Post a New Comment