This is a TODO list of improvements I’d like to see in this branch of Instiki.
If you’re interested in working on any of these topics, set yourself up with BZR, do a
% bzr pull http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/code/instiki/svn/
and start hacking away. Send me an email, when you’ve gotten somewhere, and I’ll pull the changes from your BZR repository.
We need LaTeX macros to support the various itex commands that are not part of standard LaTeX. These go in the preamble in the LaTeX templates, app/views/wiki/tex.rhtml and app/views/wiki/tex_web.rhtml.
The “TeX” link at the bottom of each individual page works. But the “export entire web to TeX” function is busted. This should be fixed or removed. (I’ve disabled it, along with the pdf-output feature. Neither really worked right, and both are dog-slow.)
application/xhtml+xml to all XHTML User-Agents (and to MathPlayer and the W3C Validator, though MathPlayer is tricky). Perhaps it would be better to only send application/xhtml+xml if we are using the “Markdown+itex2MML” filter? Maruku is designed to produce well-formed XHTML+MathML output, which, for the most part, can stand being sent as application/xhtml+xml. I’m afraid I can’t say the same for RedCloth (“Textile” filter).text/html and everyone else gets application/xhtml+xml.text/html. This is now fixed, but the code for working around Safari’s bugs could still be improved. Maybe, if Safari supported MathML, it might even be worth it.text/html to IE, and as application/xhtml+xml to everyone else. This is suboptimal for MathPlayer users. But, given that IE’s rendering of S5 slideshows is suboptimal, anyway, perhaps it’s fair to assume that anyone delivering an S5 slideshow in Instiki isn’t using IE.Mostly, the algorithm for expiring cached pages works well. But, occasionally, it screws up, and you want to expire a cached page manually. If you have command-line access, that’s as simple as deleting the corresponding file from the cache directory. But many users won’t have command-line access. For them …
flash[:notice] message (after the user has seen the message).Let’s be blunt: Instiki is kinda slow. Some of this is because Ruby and Rails are kinda slow. Ruby 1.9 (when Rails becomes 1.9-ready) will provide a huge speed-boost.
But Instiki itself could probably be much accelerated, with some rewriting. It would be good to
The main Instiki site has a TODO list of its own. Of particular interest, I think, are:
Some other things which would be nice:
An interface to manage uploaded resources.
Themes.