Recent Posts

Subscribe to Recent Posts 325 posts found

posted almost 2 years ago
mmadsen 5 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Installation/Upgrade Issues

require ‘iconv’ returns:

1.9.2p180 :001 > require ‘iconv’ LoadError: no such file to load – iconv from internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require:29:in require' from <internal:lib/rubygems/custom_require>:29:in require’ from (irb):1 from /usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/bin/irb:16:in <main>'

and when I try to install iconv as a gem:

bash-3.2# gem install iconv Fetching: iconv-0.1.gem (100%) Building native extensions. This could take a while… ERROR: Error installing iconv: ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension.

    /usr/local/rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p180/bin/ruby extconf.rb

checking for iconv() in iconv.h… no checking for iconv() in -liconv… no *** extconf.rb failed ***

 
posted almost 2 years ago
admin 57 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Installation/Upgrade Issues

Hmm. And does

# irb
> require 'iconv'

return 'true'? What does

#  /usr/bin/env ruby -v

return?

 
posted almost 2 years ago
mmadsen 5 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Installation/Upgrade Issues

Hi, I’m having trouble both upgrading an existing Instiki installation (0.19.1)MML+, and installing a plain vanilla 0.19.3 from github.

The issue seems to surround iconv, and none of the solutions or suggestions I’ve tried from googling have worked.

The platform is OSX Lion, using Ruby 1.9.2_p180, gcc compiler version:

Using built-in specs. Target: i686-apple-darwin11 Configured with: /private/var/tmp/llvmgcc42/llvmgcc42-2336.1~1/src/configure –disable-checking –enable-werror –prefix=/Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2 –mandir=/share/man –enable-languages=c,objc,c++,obj-c++ –program-prefix=llvm- –program-transform-name=/^cg/s//-4.2/ –with-slibdir=/usr/lib –build=i686-apple-darwin11 –enable-llvm=/private/var/tmp/llvmgcc42/llvmgcc42-2336.1~1/dst-llvmCore/Developer/usr/local –program-prefix=i686-apple-darwin11- –host=x86_64-apple-darwin11 –target=i686-apple-darwin11 –with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.1.00)

The installation of 0.19.3 seems to go well, ruby bundle pulls down everything 0.19.3 requires, but the following occurs upon attempting to start instiki:

mark:instiki-0.19.3/ (master) $ ./instiki -p 2501 14:26:37 NOTE: Gem.source_index is deprecated, use Specification. It will be removed on or after 2011-11-01. Gem.source_index called from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/railties/lib/rails/gem_dependency.rb:21. /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/inflector.rb:3:in require': no such file to load -- iconv (LoadError) from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/inflector.rb:3:in <top></top>(required)>' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/integer/inflections.rb:1:in `require' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/integer/inflections.rb:1:in `<top></top>(required)>' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/integer.rb:2:in `require' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/integer.rb:2:in `<top></top>(required)>' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext.rb:8:in `require' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext.rb:8:in `block in <top></top>(required)>' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext.rb:8:in `each' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext.rb:8:in `<top></top>(required)>' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support.rb:56:in `require' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support.rb:56:in `<top></top>(required)>' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/script/server:7:in `require' from /Users/mark/Dropbox/Research/Instiki/instiki-0.19.3/script/server:7:in `<top></top>(required)>' from ./instiki:6:in `load' from ./instiki:6:in `<main>'</main>

I had previously rebuilt ruby 1.9.2 in rvm, after doing rvm pkg install iconv and rebuilding 1.9.2 pointing at the rvm version of iconv, as suggested online.

I’m stumped. Has anyone else seen this? What did you do to solve it?

Thanks!

 
posted 2 years ago
distler 77 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Some questions

  • Is there a way to link to a category? My idea is to have a lot of categories, but only link to the most important ones from the homepage. I couldn’t figure out any way to do that.

Not sure what you are after. Perhaps you mean to link to the page listing all pages in category ‘foo’. The url for that is /list/foo .

  • Macros for iTex: Is there any way to define per-page or global macros?

No. Though this is a much-discussed question.

  • Errors for iTex: So far it seems like if some TeX expression doesn’t work you just get the source rendered, but there is no way to find exactly where the error is. This way if I have a long equation I am left to hunt through the whole thing for the missed bracket or parenthesis. Is there something I’m missing?

I agree that itex’s error-reporting is pretty useless. Depending on the type of error (a missed brace bracket, say), LaTeX’s is often not much better. Here, at least, you know which equation to look at for the error, as each equation is parsed separately, and errors can’t spill over as they sometimes do in LaTeX.

  • Linking and/or embedding local files: I am running Instiki locally, but I am syncing the whole thing online, so I can use it from more than one computer. I often use Xournal (on a tablet PC) to take notes/do calculations. While for high-level results, or summaries, Instiki is fine, for long/messy calculations it’s a lot faster to just hand-write them in Xournal. Ideally, I want to be able to link to a Xournal file from Instiki and have some quick way of viewing or editing it. Right now it seems like that the only way is to put a file:/// url, but that requires syncing two things separately, and making sure the url’s make sense on every computer I am using.

Look at Instiki’s file upload capability.

That probably doesn’t help you very much from the point of view of syncing between different computers (as each Instiki installation will have its own set of uploaded files).

  • Editing SVG graphics: This is something that I’m pretty sure is a bug. It seems like unless there is empty space before and after the svg tags, the “Edit SVG graphic” button doesn’t show up.

I think it doesn’t like ”<svg” as the first characters on a page. But I have not had any trouble if the graphic is in the middle of the text.

  • How can I adjust the way math is rendered? I am using Firefox 11 under Linux. All math is much smaller than the surrounding text (e.g. 0 is the height of a lower case letter). I imagine there is some CSS option to change the font size for math, but I couldn’t figure out what it was.

That’s strange. I am using Firefox on a Mac, and see no such inconsistency. Do you have the STIX fonts installed?

  • I have some programing experience, though I haven’t used Ruby before. I am willing to try to add some of these features myself, if you can give me some pointers as to where to start.

Contributions are always welcome. The source repository is available both through BZR and on Github.

 
posted 2 years ago
rzarev 1 post

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Some questions

Hello,

I just started using Instiki a few days ago. First of all, let me say I think it is great, and I think it is a really good productivity tool. (I am using it as a personal notebook, rather than a public wiki, although I might do both at some point).

That said, I have run into a few problems/inconveniences so far. I’m not sure whether they qualify as bugs, feature requests, or just something I couldn’t figure out how to do, so I’m just going to ask them all here:

  • Is there a way to link to a category? My idea is to have a lot of categories, but only link to the most important ones from the homepage. I couldn’t figure out any way to do that.

  • Macros for iTex: Is there any way to define per-page or global macros?

  • Errors for iTex: So far it seems like if some TeX expression doesn’t work you just get the source rendered, but there is no way to find exactly where the error is. This way if I have a long equation I am left to hunt through the whole thing for the missed bracket or parenthesis. Is there something I’m missing?

  • Linking and/or embedding local files: I am running Instiki locally, but I am syncing the whole thing online, so I can use it from more than one computer. I often use Xournal (on a tablet PC) to take notes/do calculations. While for high-level results, or summaries, Instiki is fine, for long/messy calculations it’s a lot faster to just hand-write them in Xournal. Ideally, I want to be able to link to a Xournal file from Instiki and have some quick way of viewing or editing it. Right now it seems like that the only way is to put a file:/// url, but that requires syncing two things separately, and making sure the url’s make sense on every computer I am using.

  • Editing SVG graphics: This is something that I’m pretty sure is a bug. It seems like unless there is empty space before and after the svg tags, the “Edit SVG graphic” button doesn’t show up.

  • How can I adjust the way math is rendered? I am using Firefox 11 under Linux. All math is much smaller than the surrounding text (e.g. 0 is the height of a lower case letter). I imagine there is some CSS option to change the font size for math, but I couldn’t figure out what it was.

I have some programing experience, though I haven’t used Ruby before. I am willing to try to add some of these features myself, if you can give me some pointers as to where to start.

 
posted 2 years ago
jackdesert55... 2 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: How to Generate Table of Contents (TOC)

distler,

so it appears that the table of contents is not generated, but rather it is its own page within the wiki. And somehow this page is displayed persistently on the right hand side. Is there some magic to getting this started?

Jack

 
posted 2 years ago
distler 77 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: How to Generate Table of Contents (TOC)

Why don’t you click on the “Source” link, say, at http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/wiki/instiki/show/HomePage, to see how it’s done. Of course, you also want to look at the source of the Sidebar itself.

 
posted 2 years ago
jackdesert55... 2 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: How to Generate Table of Contents (TOC)

The page at http://instiki.org/show/HomePage has an elegant table of contents that seems to mirror the contents of the wiki. I want to do this on my own installation. Can someone point me in the right direction?

Jack

 
posted 2 years ago
admin 57 posts

Forum: itex2MML – Topic: itex and other languages

That’s cool. I’m sure other people would be interested in your PHP extension. So you should think of packaging it for distribution (Pear?).

 
posted 2 years ago
Andrew Stacey 118 posts

Forum: itex2MML – Topic: itex and other languages

I thought it might be worth noting that the nForum (and the other mathematical forums that I run) now use itex directly in PHP. (I probably won’t get the words right on this) That is, I’ve compiled itex2MML into a PHP extension (using swig) and am calling that now instead of farming the conversion off to the nLab. I’ve also installed MathJaX to support (as best I can) non-compliant browsers.

 
posted 2 years ago
Andrew Stacey 118 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

I was checking this forum to see if you’d posted a notice that you’d fixed the bug, but I didn’t see that you’d edited your previous comment rather than posting a new one - and at the start of the week then I don’t always click through links or check RSS feeds. All of my instiki installations are now up to date. Thanks.

 
posted 2 years ago
admin 57 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

You’ll note that another bug that I fixed, in the same commit, was Maruku’s section numbering (disabled by default; see vendor/plugins/maruku/lib/maruku/defaults.rb). Dunno whether that’s of interest.

 
posted 2 years ago
Andrew Stacey 118 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

Wrong thread, then!

 
posted 2 years ago
admin 57 posts

edited 2 years ago

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

Ah.

That is indeed a bug. Fixed (in Instiki and Heterotic Beast, too). Thanks.

 
posted 2 years ago
Andrew Stacey 118 posts

edited 2 years ago

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

Take a look at http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Sandbox (feel free to ignore the request, I put that there to ensure that no-one messed with them before you’d seen it). Each theorem has .num_theorem style so the CSS counts them. However, the counting that is done by Instiki to find the theorem numbers for use in \ref{...} commands only counts those with ID tags. So the labels for the theorems that I do want to refer to are miscounted because I prefer to have all my theorems numbered rather than only number those that I explicitly refer to.

Does the same issue happen here. Let’s experiment:

Theorem

The first letter of the English alphabet is A.

Theorem

The second letter of the English alphabet is B.

Theorem

The third letter of the English alphabet is C.

Theorem

The fourth letter of the English alphabet is D.

Theorem

The fifth letter of the English alphabet is E.

Theorem

The sixth letter of the English alphabet is F.

Theorem 1 refers to A, Theorem 3 to C, and Theorem 6 to F.

Yes, so it’s the same here. Thus, no need to check the Sandbox. Here’s the source of what I just typed:


+-- {: .num_theorem #a}
###### Theorem

The first letter of the English alphabet is A.
=--

+-- {: .num_theorem}
###### Theorem

The second letter of the English alphabet is B.
=--

+-- {: .num_theorem #c}
###### Theorem

The third letter of the English alphabet is C.
=--

+-- {: .num_theorem}
###### Theorem

The fourth letter of the English alphabet is D.
=--

+-- {: .num_theorem}
###### Theorem

The fifth letter of the English alphabet is E.
=--

+-- {: .num_theorem #f}
###### Theorem

The sixth letter of the English alphabet is F.
=--

Theorem \ref{a} refers to A, Theorem \ref{c} to C, and Theorem \ref{f} to F.
 
posted 2 years ago
admin 57 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

The issue of needing ids to keep theorem numbers in step has been raised (again).

I’m not quite sure what the issue is.

So if I write

+-- {: .num_theorem}
###### Theorem
$X$ is nuclear and Banach if and only if it is finite dimensional
=--

your theorems still get numbered (correctly, I hope).

Since there’s no label, there’s no easy way to refer to this theorem, but maybe you don’t care. And if you do care, wouldn’t you want to avoid the fragility associated to an automatically-generated id (which will change if someone re-orders the theorems, adds a new one, or whatever)?

I must be misunderstanding…

 
posted 2 years ago
Andrew Stacey 118 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

The issue of needing ids to keep theorem numbers in step has been raised (again). Mike came up with a suggestion which seems reasonable on first reading which is that instiki (or whichever part of it is appropriate) adds an automatic id if one isn’t present, much in the way that the table of contents part does.

So if I write

+-- {: .num_theorem}
###### Theorem
$X$ is nuclear and Banach if and only if it is finite dimensional
=--

then instiki adds an automatic id, say id="theorem1" where the 1 gets incremented according to the internal counter (which it has, if I remember right, since it uses that to figure out the ref number). Would this be feasible?

 
posted 2 years ago
tws01 2 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: S5 presentation export

Thanks for thinking some more! :-)

I wonder why the number of files is so large. If you look at the “nanoc-slidy” solution the number of files does not look too big. BTW some of the features of JessyInk (inkscape) - the option of inserting “whiteboards” during the talk and draw on the slides would certainly be another great feature. Although I know how much work that means, a tool which supports in collecting information for lectures, at the same time allows for preparing the slides and at the end you get an output which you can use on any computer with a browser (or a portable firefox). And this program supports drawing on the slides … I am dreaming - but Instiki has great potential!

Thanks

T

 
posted 2 years ago
distler 77 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: S5 presentation export

It’s not so clear to me what the best approach is.

The number of CSS and Javascript files (MathJax, in particular, is huge) required to support a single S5 slideshow is very large.

It would be possible, but very inefficient, to produce a Zip file, with all of that junk, for every slideshow you decided to export.

In some ways, you’d be better off putting an entire Instiki installation on a USB stick (assuming that the host computer has Ruby).

A hybrid approach would be to export a static file of the S5 slideshow, with the URLs rewritten to point to the files in an Instiki installation.

Gotta think some more …

 
posted 2 years ago
tws01 2 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: S5 presentation export

As far as I can see, an export of a S5 slideshow with all the scripts is not implemented with the current version of instiki. I believe this would be a great feature if one could export a slide show which was prepared within instiki onto a memory stick (with all the scripts, css and embedded graphs at the right place) and use the presentation “offline” on a system without a ruby/rails/instiki installation.

Is there some work around to achieve this?

T

 
posted 2 years ago
distler 77 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

I’m sure there’s a solution for that: …

Is this a feature that is implemented somewhere?

Your short description is slightly … underspecified. So looking at an actual implementation would be helpful to me, in deciding whether this is something to implement in Instiki.

 
posted 2 years ago
Bernhard Sta... 4 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

That sounds like a request for macro-support in itex. For a variety of reasons, that’s unlikely to happen.

What I mean is a research-friendly facility

  • to define vocabularies for abstract mathematical languages (notations), and
  • to render terms of that language in configurable ways. An implementation of this idea might use Turing-complete macros, but would be using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

I, for one, would be against this. It would actually hinder collaboration as everyone would have to learn the local conventions every time they wanted to edit a page, and stuff that worked on one wouldn’t work on another.

I’m sure there’s a solution for that: A vocabulary could be modelled in a distributed fashion much like OWL ontologies or XML Schema Definitions, which allow for importing other “vocabularies” (ontologies/schemata). One could even imagine a versioning and migration scheme to implement the global refactorings I mentioned in my first post. I haven’t thought this through, but that might even be a practical application of basic category theory ;) BTW this also has the advantage that a user doesn’t have to learn the language again and again.

 
posted 2 years ago
Andrew Stacey 118 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

That sounds like a request for macro-support in itex. For a variety of reasons, that’s unlikely to happen.

I, for one, would be against this. It would actually hinder collaboration as everyone would have to learn the local conventions every time they wanted to edit a page, and stuff that worked on one wouldn’t work on another.

 
posted 2 years ago
admin 57 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

That sounds like a request for macro-support in itex. For a variety of reasons, that’s unlikely to happen.

On the other hand, perhaps you have something else in mind …

 
posted 2 years ago
Bernhard Sta... 4 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

As far as I can see, there’s a lot of discussion about notational conventions on nLab, e.g. in the article on comma categories. However, there’s a huge number of articles that would have to changed if some notation actually was to be consistently adopted. I haven’t made any scientific investigations, but it seems clear to me that this hinders improvement of notation. Good notation is essential for making mathematics intuitive and useable, so wouldn’t it make sense to add powerful features for expressing and experimenting with notations?

A first step would be separating data and presentation, e.g. writing “\commacategory{F}{G}” or similar (not necessarily itex) instead of “F \downarrow G”. The concrete notation would be specified at a separate stage. This could happen

  • globally by the site operators to consistently change all occurences
  • per-article by the authors e.g. to avoid notation clashes
  • individually by the user based on his preferences.

If this was done in every article, changing notations would become a matter of seconds. This would of course mean that in the case of nLab, some thousands of articles have to be changed (maybe some heuristics could be used to speed this up), but that has to be done only once and then hopefully never again. Future search-and-replace style global “refactorings” for generalizing or normalizing notation would become possible, too.

The major technical challenge I see would be finding a good mechanism for specifying abstract notations. The rest should be pretty straightforward.

What do you think about this?

 
posted 2 years ago
Andrew Stacey 118 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Feature Requests

(Hopefully minor) feature request: this came up in a discussion on citing the nLab. It would be convenient to have the current revision number displayed on the page somewhere obvious. Perhaps the footer could read:

Version 144, revised on December 1, 2011 11:24:39 by …

I know it’s easy to deduce - take the number after “Back in time” and add 1 - which is why I said “convenient” rather than anything stronger.

 
posted 2 years ago
dietg 4 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Bugs

Your page is a good example for what I wanted to say. The content text is large (even larger than on this page, I believe), in contrast to the table of contents text which is rather “normal” size, similar to how most Web pages out there would show up in my browser. I would expect, that Instiki does not enlarge the content text by default, but leave it to the page designer to tune the font size, if (s)he thinks it’s needed.

 
posted 2 years ago
admin 57 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Bugs

Q: what do I need to do to get Instiki chosing a normal font size for my Web by default?

You might try setting the font-size on #Content. But I’m puzzled: is the font-size different from what you see on my Instiki site (which should be the same as the font-size here). Or are those also too large for your taste?

 
posted 2 years ago
dietg 4 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Bugs

I installed the latest development version, and the bug with the schema is gone indeed. Thanks! The content is also migrated with some hand-work… A nice Import feature would be really helpful. Any plans?

Now I’m struggling with something else: The (normal) text of my Web is displayed in a rather large font. Much larger than it is displayed for example on the “Edit Web” page. I see font-size: 1em in instiki.css, which looks fine to me, so I can’t explain it. I’d like to have a “normal” font size, so I’m tweaking the style sheet, defining a proper font-size for my Web on body, but then the Edit Web page’s font gets too small…

Q: what do I need to do to get Instiki chosing a normal font size for my Web by default?

Thanks again for good hints.

 
posted 2 years ago
admin 57 posts

Forum: Instiki – Topic: Bugs

Hi, I’m trying out Instiki 0.19.3 on Mac OS X Snow Leopard and am running into an issue when publishing a Web. On each page (at the top) I get displayed: …

That’s a bug, which was fixed in Revision 770.

Grab a copy of the latest development version (or get it from my BZR repository or from Github).

Another issue: after installing a new version if Instiki I wanted to import the extisting content from the old installation.

You can copy over your old database, and then follow the upgrade instructions to update the schema to the latest version.